Unbelievably, the Mannheim prison  (at right) seems to be denying Günter Deckert his mail and visitor privileges. Gunter entered the prison on Jan. 3rd to serve a 5-month sentence for "disturbing the peace of the people" many years ago by doing a small bit of translation in a holocaust revisionist book.

A friend, Matthias, just sent this email:

last week I tried to sign up for a visit to Günter. A female employee of the prison told me that Günter had not put me on his list of visitors. So I wrote a letter to Günter asking him to put me on the list of visitors. Since I did not get an answer, I called Günter's wife who told me that my name actually can be found on the list but, with the exception of his closest family, nobody got permission for a visit to Günter.

Obviously the prison employee was lying to me.

Grüße, regards,

Matthias

Seems to me they have decided that any visitors Günter would get would be from "neo-nazis" and they would be bad for his "rehabilitation." Once I sent a letter to Germar Rudolf when he was still in prison in Germany. They informed him he could not receive this letter because it contained words and thoughts they deemed to be harmful to their program for change and improvement of his mental state. Germar asked me so nicely to be more careful of what I wrote in the future. My previous letters had gotten through alright, so I became a little bolder. They really take seriously that you are there to be made safe for society.

Matthias is obviously a marked man, as would, no doubt, any friend and associate of Gunter be considered. Has anyone in the United States heard back from Günter yet?

Jan. 19, 2013

Harlan Schulke is Carolyn’s guest to discuss what he considers to be very meaningful differences between translations of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion – the two main ones being the Victor Marsden and the Boris Brasol (or perhaps Natalie de Bogery) translations. Brazol’s translation was used for The International Jew by Henry Ford. In addition to comparing specific passages, Schulke made the following points:

• Just the fact that our government is filled with “dual-Israeli-U.S. citizens” reflects much that is written in the Protocols;
• Jewish nationalism is the term he prefers over “global conspiracy;”
• The source of Jewish nationalism is in the Old Testament book of Deuteronomy;
• The Protocols also throw light on the ritual murder accusations through the centuries.

Pictured right:  Boris Brazol, Russian monarchist expatriate credited with translating the Protocols, in a library after coming to the U.S. I could not find a picture that I was sure was Victor Marsden. Schulke rates the Brazol translation as inferior to that of Marsden.

Jan. 17, 2013

Pictured:  War Industries Board – The largest of the superagencies  during WW1 was headed by the financier Bernard Baruch. Of the seven members, three were Jews. Standing: Adm. F.F. Fletcher, Hugh Fraune, Col. Palmer E. Pierce, H.P. Ingels. Seated: Daniel Willard, Robert S. Brookings, Robert S. Lovett, and Bernard M. Baruch. Essentially, the WIB made purchases, allocated supplies, fixed prices at levels that business requested, and ordered the standardization of goods to save materials and streamline production. (e.g the varieties of automobile tires were reduced from 287 to 3)

Hadding Scott and Carolyn Yeager read and comment on Chapter 25, “Disraeli of America” – A Jew of Super-Power.

A look at the autocratic rule over the United States gained by the Jew Bernard Baruch, under the presidency of Democrat Woodrow Wilson,  as the man who “mobilized American industry for war.”

It is reported that he once said of himself, “Behold the Disraeli of the United States!” and told a Congressional committee, “I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true.” TIJ suggests that Baruch’s example of governing the country during the war gave his co-religionists a very valuable education in the art of autocracy.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of  The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Jan. 14, 2013

This program looks into the question of just how far media manipulation can go in an agenda of conditioning our minds to the desired perceptions.  Carolyn thinks psyops, originally military-style Psychological Operations, have become increasingly used domestically (with the help of the public's dependence on television), while her guest Hadding Scott dismisses such an idea as impossible to keep from being revealed. However, they are revealed but most people refuse to accept that such "Big Lies" could or would  be carried out.

The discussion centers around the Sandy Hook “massacre” in Newtown, Conn. Among the ideas offered:

• Information “warfare” has always been accepted as a legitimate way to reach political objectives; movies and television are the primary vehicles now;
• News media like CNN can show us a “fictive” world that is based in truth, but not the whole, relevant or contextual truth;
• Already in 1995, there existed the capability of combining live actors with computer-generated video graphics to create a “virtual” scene;
• Psychological warfare, a component of information operations,  is intended mainly to demoralize the opposition so that they won’t fight;
• Gun control legislation appears to be the primary political objective (also called national objective) of the Sandy Hook televised event;
• And much more.

Image: Anderson Cooper, a former CIA trainee, is engaged in information warfare as a news presenter at CNN.

Jan. 12, 2013

Rare photo of inside the Sandy Hook firehouse (which is where we are told  hundreds of kids were hidden) tweeted at 11:36 am on Dec. 14 does not show it packed with children. (I see three ~ cy) Photo credit: Audrey Washington, NBC , on Twitter, copied from memoryhole.com

We are told that the lesson to be drawn from the Sandy Hook “massacre” is that easy access to assault-type weapons creates a public danger of untold proportions. We need to understand that the real danger is from our public media, which is the ultimate WMD (weapon of mass destruction) for our people.

The media has given us an “official narrative” of Sandy Hook which on even semi-close inspection cannot be believed. Thus it comes under the category of  an operation to “change our perception of reality” in order to make us more pliable to the wishes of our governments. (In other words, a psychological operation or psyop.)

Carolyn discusses the reports and rumors about Sandy Hook from this point of view and points to the danger within the “alternative media” and/or “truth movement” of getting bogged down in debate over details of little consequence, as has happened in the 9/11 Truth Movement and also in “The Holocaust,” for that matter.   Mentioned on the program: Fla. Atlantic Univ. Professor James Tracy interviewed on Guns and Butter.  Jan. 11th attack on Prof. Tracy by CNN’s Anderson Cooper.

Jan. 10, 2013

Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott read and comment on Chapter 24, The High and Low of Jewish Money Power.

Jewish high finance began in America with the Rothschilds and their agent August Belmont, who professed Christianity. Much of the veil of secrecy that held sway at that time, the mysterious magic surrounding large transactions between governments and individuals, has been stripped away. The Rothschild strategy has always been to bet on both sides so you never lose.

The large Jewish banking houses such as Kuhn, Loeb and Co. met resistance from the Gentile establishment of the day in their  effort to gain the upper hand in U.S. finance. This chapter also describes the lower and darker side of financial activity in this country, and relates the story of the shocking (at the time) Wall St. theft of $12,000,000 in bonds via an organized ring of mostly Russian Jews that began in 1918 and flourished until 1920. To things like this, there is complete silence from the upper level of Jewry. TIJ attributes the silence to the “racial instinct.”

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of  The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file. 

By Carolyn Yeager

The man who now calls himself Naftali Prince (Fürst translates to Prince in English), and who was also known in childhood as Duro Forst, is the person circled in both photos below, taken at around the same time shortly after the Buchenwald “liberation” on April 11, 1945.

Above: “Buchenwald children on the release day. Naftali Fürst is marked in a yellow circle.”  (As per Naftali’s website, http://furststory.com/English/Holocaust_Kinder.html)

Below: “Buchenwald. Naftali Furst is marked with a yellow circle.”  Can this be a 12-year-old boy? The man two rows directly below him is identified as being 25-yrs old.

 Left:  “Our parents and us after the war“  (As per http://furststory.com/English/YaldutMomDad.html) Naftali is to the left of his father, although he resembles his mother, while his older brother takes after their father.

Why is it that he looks younger in the family photo, at age 13 or 14, than he does a year or two earlier in the barracks? Because it’s not him in the barracks, that’s why. Simply look at the difference in the forehead in the comparison of the two faces (right). The man in the bunk has a low hairline (short forehead). The real Naftali Fürst has a higher forehead. Thus he’s another one who succumbed to the temptation to join an exclusive club by falsely identifying himself in this famous photo. The holocaust museum people will never investigate and will never say otherwise.

Continue reading this article at Elie Wiesel Cons The World

Jan. 7, 2013

VERY extensive is the answer given by Carolyn and her guest Christine Miller. They look at many of the most famous images that allegedly represent “atrocities” that “prove” the sadism of the Germans and their allies, and explain that they are obvious photo montages, drawings/paintings or combinations, while some are simply mislabeled to purposely blame the wrong party.

Of the images discussed, some are found on Wikipedia’s The Holocaust page; others in mainstream books by Jews, like propagandist Daniel Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners. A good source that debunks many of these photos is Udo Walendy‘s Forged War Crimes malign the German Nation. As Walendy says, anyone who uses falsified pictures in their work, without investigation, becomes suspect in all their statements.

Image shown above:  Widely distributed “photograph” that purports to be evidence of medical experiments performed by Nazi doctors at Auschwitz is really a drawing with photographed heads put on the bodies. Note the absence of necks. See here.  At right is a detail of seated girl on far left which shows plainly that it’s a painting.

By Carolyn Yeager

Max Hamburger, a Jewish-Dutch psychiatrist, is the man in the above photograph taken in 2012. He is 92 years of age. The photo is blurry because it was retrieved from a pdf here that doesn’t allow to save it to one’s computer files.

Hamburger has identified himself as the fourth figure in the bottom row of the famous Buchenwald photo — the figure he is pointing to with his thumb. He was 25 years-old in April 1945 when the camp was “liberated” by American troops. I want you to notice right away the space between Hamburger’s nose and upper lip — it is unusually long. It can be more clearly determined by going to the pdf. The face of the young man in the famous photo does not have that long space, but just a normal, or even short, distance between nose and mouth. This is facial structure that doesn’t change, which tells me he is not the same person.

Born on February 10,  1920 in Amsterdam, Max began the study of medicine in 1938 and, as best I can make out from Dutch language sources,  he was arrested in 1942 because of his activism in the Dutch Resistance and sent to Westerbork, a camp for political prisoners in The Netherlands. He ended up in Auschwitz and then Buchenwald, he says, taking the usual route. According to this page, he was suffering from TB, and also malnutrition, when the famous photo he’s holding in his hands was taken.

The blurb on the Flicker page also says “he only survived Auschwitz because he could work as a medical assistant.” One has to ask about all those who didn’t work as a medical assistant, but also survived and went to Buchenwald … and survived Buchenwald too without being medical assistants! This is the kind of meaningless tripe we are always given to explain why people survived “death camps.”  This page also says he now (in 2008) lives in Belgium and gives talks about his wartime experiences. In other words, he advertises himself as a holocaust survivor who is in the Famous Buchenwald Liberation Photo, the one that Elie Wiesel is in. (See final section below)

It should be noted that Nicholas Grüner is in this photo too; he is the first person on the left in the bottom row and the only one of the three mentioned who actually looks like himself, and is himself. Yet the labeling of this photograph at Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem (below) gives three possible identities for this figure:  Gershon Blonder,  Josef Reich or Nicholas (Miklos) Grüner … as if it were in doubt. The other two are not shown to be in doubt:  the fourth figure on the bottom is Max Hamburger;  the seventh figure in the 2nd row is Elie Wiesel.  It’s clear to me that Yad Vashem will eventually deny that Nicholas Grüner is in the photo at all, and thus his claim that Elie Wiesel was not in the camp (or the photo) will be weakened. These people are nothing if not devious … and they accomplish their objective in a gradual manner. According to Yad Vashem …

Please continue reading this article at Elie Wiesel Cons The World