Holocaust Revisionism

Must watch: Vincent Reynouard challenges British authorities over new UK Holocaust museum

Published by carolyn on Sun, 2017-02-26 15:11

This is the site given up to British Jews for the new museum - none other than Victoria Garden in front of the Victoria Tower, a part of Westminster Palace, the most iconic piece of architecture in all London. Imagine the power exerted for this to happen!


UK Holocaust Memorial Museum: I challenge the British Authorities
 
Next year, a Holocaust Museum Memorial will be built in the heart of London, near the Parliament. In this video, a French revisionist, Vincent Reynouard, challenges the British authorities. He asks:
   1) for the Memorial's designer to provide proof, a single element of proof that confirms the existence of "gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Majdanek, Treblinka, Sobibor or Belzec.
   2) for a public debate between revisionists and historians to discuss the value of this evidence. 

WATCH ON YOUTUBE

or on the PHDNM site

Carolyn's comment:

Björn Höcke apologizes for Holocaust speech; Compact interviews Andreas Wild

Published by carolyn on Sat, 2017-02-18 17:41

L to R: Andreas Wild, Björn Höcke, Hans-Joachim Berg of the Alternative fur Deutschland party in Thuringia.


by Carolyn Yeager

DISAPPOINTINGLY (BUT FOR THE SAKE OF PARTY HEALING OBVIOUSLY), the leader of the AfD in Thuringia state took a step back and, while speaking at a state party meeting today (Saturday) in Arnstadt announced, “"I took a big, important topic and unfortunately turned it into beer hall talk. That was a mistake. For that, I would like to apologize here."

He was referring to a speech in Dresden on January 17 in which he correctly described the grotesque Berlin Holocaust memorial as a “monument to shame” and said Germans should instead be encouraged to look forward to a proud future, not always back to a past of only 12 years length. Those words were well-received by the AfD youth organization to which he was speaking, but naturally brought loud criticism from the center and left political parties and establishment Jews.

Jewish Paranoia: Vincent Reynouard answers a Jew, in English

Published by carolyn on Tue, 2017-02-14 13:52

Vincent Reynouard narrates in English! A real treat to be able to watch a Reynouard video without reading subtitles rather than looking at the images. Although, the subtitles are there in case you have trouble now and then with his French accent. Vincent's admirable and successful efforts to communicate are appreciated.

In this new video, he replies to an anonymus emailer, a Jewish viewer who accuses Reynouard of provoking anti-Semitism and promises him prison.  Reynouard explains why always crying "anti-Semitism" (which remains the principal strategy of the liar unmasked) risks leading the Jewish people into the abyss. 

My comment: This is a very important topic. Study of the Jewish involvement in the creation of 'Holocaust' propaganda myths reveals that everything is used by them to defend against their actual #1 fear - real anti-Semitism. World Jewry elites don't really fear another Holocaust, they fear the world will stop believing in the one they invented. Rather than admit the lie, the common Jews are indoctrinated to believe in a long history of persecution and to  point the finger of blame always away from themselves and call it anti-Semitism. This will have bad consequences for Jews in the long run, says Reynouard.

Watch on youtube.

A History of the World Jewish Congress

Published by carolyn on Fri, 2017-02-10 19:54

by Carolyn Yeager

IF U.S. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP CAN BE ATTACKED AS "HITLER" (called racist, hater, genocidal dictator) it's because the WW2 propaganda lies about Hitler have never undergone rational discussion in the general public, been treated with objectivity, and in so doing been discredited. Instead, even those on the political right, the “conservatives”, White nationalists and White identity groups and individuals in general have quietly caved in to the “Holocaust” narrative for all these years.

The crass lies, false rumors and wartime fake intelligence reports continue to be spread via the (((media))), (((entertainment outlets))), (((academia))) and (((publishers of history books))) with minimum resistance. This cowardice in standing up against this trash-talk is responsible for the situation we're in now in the U.S. and Europe – with a historically ignorant, brainwashed population convinced that to protect and strengthen one's nation, to show preference for those residing within your own national borders in the same way you show preference to your own family members over strangers, the same way you safeguard your home against intruders, is wrong, even evil, because it's “what Hitler did.” And look what happened there.

We can't have it both ways. We can't join in the repudiation of Hitler, the world's most famous nationalist, and successfully fight against the repudiation of Trump on the same grounds.

It's not just the Jews … says critic

Published by carolyn on Sat, 2017-02-04 20:57

The 1948 World Jewish Congress in Montreax, France, the year Israel became a state.


By Carolyn Yeager

MY PREVIOUS POST (The World Jewish Congress and the Auschwitz Myth) got a response from “Joe” on another discussion space that I want to reply to here in a more thoughtful manner than I did there. Joe wrote:

It's not just the jews who are heavily invested in this yarn...without it World War ll would have been fought in vain; it's what gives the conflict its overwhelming moral dimension. Churchill lost an empire as a consequence of destroying Satin incarnate. Without Auschwitz  his war mongering would have not been vindicated. The reputation of Roosevelt would  also have been relegated to the toilet if not for the Holocaust. He saw the '' danger '' when the American public did not and marched his country into an unnecessary  war . Furthermore,  the terror bombings of the Anglo- American air forces can only be justified by the existence of the death camps. 

joe

Many of you might generally agree with Joe on first reading, but I disagree. And I want to tell you why. Who but Jews are “heavily invested” in this yarn, as he calls it, to the point of actively propping it up not just year after year, but day after day. Is it the US or British governments, or the Army, Navy or Air Force doing this? No. Their “investment” rarely goes beyond honoring the anniversaries relating to the 2nd World War, which includes honoring the fallen and the veterans. None of this includes the Holocaust.

The World Jewish Congress and the Auschwitz Myth

Published by carolyn on Fri, 2017-01-27 13:20

For three days in January, 2017, the World Jewish Congress was allowed to have this installation operating next to the “Monument to the Victims,” the main tourist attraction at Auschwitz II – Birkenau.


By Carolyn Yeager

So long as the Auschwitz Myth retains its terrible power, the recovery of our national self-esteem is virtually impossible.

This was written in 1979 by Wilhelm Stäglich, a Finance Court judge in Hamburg and former Army officer whose duties in 1944 put him in contact with the SS command at the Auschwitz main camp. Even though 38 years have passed, Germans have still not regained their self-esteem in 2017. The Auschwitz Myth and “its terrible power” is the reason.

The World Jewish Congress (WJC) not only virtually created the myth but since has led the campaign to keep its handiwork alive. It is in the interests of World Jewry to keep not only Germans but as much of the white world as possible in a belief of everlasting guilt for unspeakable crimes against the Jewish people. This means, 72 years after the so-called liberation of Auschwitz, the memory of the myth must remain fresh and alive. Thus, the WJC played a major role in getting a resolution passed in 2005 at the United Nations for a day of commemoration to “honor the victims of the holocaust” and, once accomplished, continues to participate strongly every year at remembrance ceremonies at the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial/Museum in Poland.

It's that time again ...

Published by carolyn on Wed, 2017-01-25 09:42

The 4th Annual Commemoration in Honor of the Revisionists Who Introduced Sanity to the Auschwitz “Death Camp” Narrative is celebrated on Friday, January 27.

This year's theme is “Exploring the Origins of the Auschwitz Legend.” As the media continues to huff and puff in support of the United Nations-created “International Day of Commemoration in Memory of the Victims of the Holocaust” (a resolution that was pushed through the UN general assembly by Israel in 2005 with only a voice vote), the reality is that the 'gas chamber' stories have long been exposed as fabrications.

A Polish Catholic denies Hitler's religiosity with false 'facts'

Published by carolyn on Sun, 2016-12-25 17:07

Danusha V. Goska identifies herself as a Polish Catholic writer who wants to dispell negative  stereotypes about Poles.


By Carolyn Yeager

FRIDAY IN MY INBOX I FOUND A FORWARDED ARTICLE by a certain Danusha Goska from a site I never look at, the 'progressive' pro-Israel website Front Page Mag. It was titled “Hitler's Religion,” so I began to read it. Long and tedious as it was, I was losing interest until I got near the end to the paragraphs I've reproduced below.

The article was based on a new book by Richard Weikart, Hitler's Religion: The Twisted Beliefs that Drove the Third Reich. Goska writes that “Weikart makes the case that Hitler's God was a Darwin-inspired, non-personal, pantheistic deity exacting a pitiless survival-of-the-fittest-through-struggle morality.” Weikart (and Goska) wants to kill the idea that Hitler and National-Socialist Germany were ever, in any way, Christian - thus that any of his policies could have had a Christian basis. The idea is to refute the more common historical opinion that German Christians perverted or set aside their native Christian beliefs in order to participate in National-Socialism, up to and including the horrors of the “holocaust.”

A brief overview of Thomas Dalton's "The Holocaust: An Introduction"

Published by carolyn on Mon, 2016-10-03 01:15

by Carolyn Yeager

THE FULL TITLE IS THE HOLOCAUST: AN INTRODUCTION -- EXPLORING THE EVIDENCE, which may mean it is the first of a series and there is at least one more coming. I didn't ask about that because this slender paperback of 120 pages stands alone just fine. Some might say about this book: Do we need another introductory level revisionist book? Hasn't it all been covered already?

Yes to both questions. We need this book because its fundamental premise is that the debate is over, the revisionists have won. It makes clear that unless the holocaust historians – or the keepers of the holocaust, as I would call that group – can come up with some new evidence for their claims, they have lost. What this book sets out to prove, in very simple language, is that the standard holocaust story is not based on evidence at all, never has been, for the reason there is no evidence for it. Lacking evidence, the keepers of the holocaust rely on the cooperation of the law, the mainstream media in its broadest sense, and the most prestigious academic institutions to give the official WW2 narrative public credibility.

Professor Robert Faurisson found guilty of racial defamation in French court

Published by carolyn on Thu, 2016-09-29 16:29

Robert Faurisson (right) with unidentified man at the Paris correctional court on Sept. 27, where he was sentenced to 4 months imprisonment (suspended) and a €4,000 fine.


IN AN EMAIL FROM DAMIEN VIGUIER, ROBERT FAURISSON'S BARRISTER, to certain interested parties, it was learned that on September 27th, the 17th chamber of the Paris correctional court ruled that Professor Faurisson was guilty of one charge out of the three that were prosecuted against him on June 21.

All charges stemmed from the talk Faurisson gave in Tehran in 2006 titled “The Victories of Revisionism” and his published paper of that name. [See also Faurisson's recent follow-up at jan27.org] The lawsuit was brought, as usual, by the Jewish LICRA [International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism], who were granted €3,000 in damages and €2,000 in legal costs. Adding that to the fine of €4,000, the total judgment amounts to €9,000.

Pages