Holocaust Revisionism

Dec. 16, 2013

A four-way discussion about the future of holocaust revisionism (today called “holocaust denial” by the holocaust industry) between Germar Rudolf, Friedrich Paul (Fritz) Berg, Dana Roccapriore and host Carolyn Yeager. Some of what was covered:

• Mark Weber gained control of the Institute for Historical Review in the mid-nineties and shifted its entire purpose away from Holocaust Revisionism to no position on anything;
• Weber was never a real revisionist (even in the 1980′s), according to both Berg and Rudolf;
• Weber resisted publishing books by Germar Rudolf,  didn’t want to translate papers from German revisionists, and wanted to write his own summaries of articles submitted by others;
• With David Irving, Weber was observed behaving like a total sycophant; he even appeared to be in love with Irving;
• Many still think the IHR under Weber “looks good” and so financially support it;
• Caller Jim brought up the H. Himmler “Posen speech,” which both Berg and Rudolf consider genuine but misunderstood;
• Dana presented the view that most people are bored by “holocaust” in the media – he expects a backlash coming to which Germar agreed but more in Europe than in the U.S.

Image: The Journal of Historical Review was published from 1980 to 2002, when it finally fully succumbed to the negligence and disinterest of Mark Weber.

This is a Plan of Treblinka drawn by Samuel Willenberg in 1984. (click to enlarge) It is one of the various maps of the camp published after the war which are found in the book Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp? by Mattogno and Graf. All the "plans" have many inaccuracies. (This one from S. Willenberg, Revolt in Treblinka, Warsaw 1989, p 6)

By Carolyn Yeager

If alternative and pro-white Internet radio hosts persevere in bringing Mark Weber on as a guest, he should have to face tough questions about the ridiculous and harmful positions he has taken on homicidal gas chambers in German WWII transit camps.

Weber is Director of the Institute for Historical Review, which through the first half of its existance was a Holocaust Revisionist-promoting organization. Under Weber's direction, it discarded that focus and now exists as a rudderless, drifting entity, accomplishing nothing other than caretaking the archives that contain the work from its better days.

Dec. 9, 2013

The Institute for Historical Review under the Directorship of Mark Weber (since 1995) has let us down. For going on 20 years, Mark Weber has engineered the decline of what was the world’s foremost Holocaust Revisionist center of activity. We who really care about cleaning up the gross lies about this historical “event” must find a way to get Weber out of the IHR and put new blood in. Some topics:

• Preparation underway for Jan. 27 project … to counter the Day of Commemoration for Victims of the Holocaust put on at the United Nations and Auschwitz-Birkenau every year;
• What are your answers to the most frequently asked questions by the “brainwashed believers” – send them in;
• Campaign to get “movement” radio hosts to stop inviting Mark Weber for interviews;
• The value of movies made with actors playing significant figures, such as Adolf Hitler in “The Greatest Story Never Told”

Click on image to enlarge

Dec. 2, 2013

In the first hour, Carolyn continues her criticism of  Mark Weber, and includes radio show hosts  Kyle Hunt, Rodney Martin and Deanna Spingola who have given Weber an easy time of it, rather than asking, and demanding answers to, tough questions. Mark Weber has been a disastrous director of the Institute for Historical Review and should be held accountable  for it. Rewarding people for failure and weakness is the absolute wrong thing to do if we are serious about turning things around for ourselves. [By the way, I forgot to mention I sent an email to MW on Sunday inviting him to come on my Saturday Afternoon program; he has not replied. I knew he wouldn't, but still, he could take the opportunity to defend himself ... if he had a defense.]

Second hour focuses on John Friend and his friendliness with Jews over quite a period of time. Why does he express himself as strongly as anyone does against Jews in White society, and at the same time link for no good reason to anti-Hitler websites run by Jews? John’s compulsion to have his finger in every pie leads to the conclusion that he is just dabbling and won’t last long in any of it. Carolyn finishes up with Adolf Hitler’s words in 1931 that “German life must be purged of all foreign (Jewish) elements that distort the true German Spirit.” Substitute Aryan for German. 1h44m

From left: Mark Weber, visitor Fredrick Toben, Greg Raven at the IHR office in Southern California in April 1997.

By Carolyn Yeager

Mark Weber must be forced out of the IHR along with his Board of Directors and a brand new Board should be appointed by a committee made up of at least nine recognized historical/holocaust revisionists, each with a track record of honesty and commitment. This is the method Weber used in the early nineties when he played a major role in ousting founder Willis Carto from the IHR, so it can't be called unfair.

Nov. 23, 2013

Watercolor (21 x 25 inches) by Hans Christoph, one of the “artworks” that poor,  persecuted Jews are fighting to get their hands on. Called German Expressionism, how is this different from ordinary cartoons or caricatures that thousands of run-of-mill artists can do?

More of the art in the Cornelius Gurlitt collection has been put online, while a task-force, under Uwe Hartmann, has been set up to investigate the provenance of each one. Organized jewry is howling in protest because this could take a long time, and could prove much of their tale of “Nazi theft from Jews” to be wrong.  Cornelius will immediately get back over 300 of the artworks as rightly belonging to him, bringing more criticism from jews.

Nov. 4, 2013

Carolyn completes the 6-program discussion of the 1500 page rebuttal revisionist work The "Extermination Camps" of "Aktion Reinhardt" by Carlo Mattogno, Thomas Kues and Jürgen Graf. The book concludes with the following powerful summation:

• No documentary evidence exists for a program of gassing Jews in any of these camps (Belzec, Treblinka, Sorbibor);
• No material (or forensic) evidence has been discovered that reveals anything resembling "gas chambers" in these camps;
• The tentative grave site areas that have been identified, but not excavated, are not nearly large enough to hold all the bodies or even cremation ashes of the number of victims claimed to have been killed there;
• The wood requirements necessary to cremate the vast number of bodies claimed would have taken 26 1/2 years to cut and deliver;
• The cremation time in all three camps would have taken up to 12 months longer than the camps were open, to burn to ash approx. 200,000 bodies in Sobibor, 434,508 bodies in Belzec and 760,424 in Treblinka;
• The testimonies of both survivors and guards are contradictory, frequently demonstrably false, even nonsensical.

Image: The two-volume soft-cover book can now be purchased at Codoh book store, TBR and Amazon. 

Oct. 28, 2013

Discussion of the United Nations’ sponsored International Day of Commemoration for Victims of the Holocaust, on January 27 every year since 2006, with official ceremonies at the UN in New York, in Israel and at the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial in Poland. There is also the Days of Remembrance commemorated on the 27th Day of Nisan (Hebrew calendar) since 1953 in Israel, joined by the United States in 1982 by an act of Congress. Carolyn is encouraging a Revisionist event for this coming Jan. 27, 2014.

Carolyn covers some highlights of Chapt. 8 in the new revisionist book The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”. Thomas Kues writes about the new 2012 book on “Archeological Surveys at Sobibor 2000-2011″ by Marek Bem, Director of Sobibor Park and Museum, and archeologist Wojiech Mazurek. They cover all the recent archeological investigations from 2000-2001, another in 2004, in 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 … and 2011! and never has the “gas chamber” been found. Nor the burial grounds. Yet still they claim they are there … somewhere! Propagandistic newspaper interviews exclaim that “250,000 to 300,000 murdered victims at this one location is not out of the question.” The next survey to be undertaken should finally destroy the last refuge of the “gas chamber legend,” writes Kues with delight.

Image:  Aerial photograph of the Sobibor camp perimeter, probably 1942-43. “Known” structrures are not there, including Camp II barracks (lower centre), as well as Camp III (upper right), and Camp IV (right). The railway unloading platform (with visible prewar train station) marked with the red arrow; fantasy location of “gas chambers” marked with a cross; undressing area marked with square, with adjacent “Road to Heaven” through the forest. Click to enlarge.

Thanks to James Damon (right) for the English translation of this outstanding interview given by Erich Priebke to his Italian attorney Dr. Paolo Giachini and translated anonymously into German.

See UPDATE 10-24 from Dr. Giachini and Robert Faurisson at end of interview.

 The Interview

Question: Herr Priebke, several years ago you stated that you never deny your past. Now that you are 100 years old, do you still think that?

Answer: Yes.

Q: Would you please elucidate?

A: Long ago I made the decision to remain true to myself.

Q: So, do you still consider yourself a National Socialist?

A: Loyalty to our past determines our convictions and our character.
This is the way I view the world and my ideals. It is what was once our German Weltanschauung, the way we view the world. It is what still determines my sense of honor and my self-respect. Politics is something different. National Socialism perished with the defeat of Germany and today there is no longer any prospect of its continuation.