Jews make demands on our government and receive unbelievable benefits the rest of us don't get

Published by carolyn on Sun, 2018-05-06 15:57

Members of the U.S. Presidential Delegation to the 70rh Anniversary of the Auschwitz liberation, 2015 - all dressed in black, for mourning I suppose. Special Envoy for Holocaust Survivors Aviva Sufian at far left.


The following is taken from an article by Philip Giraldi, Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest which advocates for an American-values-and-interests-based foreign policy in the Middle East. He writes:

Most Americans are certainly unaware of the many provisions benefiting Israeli and broader Jewish interests that are inserted into U.S. government legislation and procedural guidelines. Here are some of them:

**** 'Holocaust survivors,' which include any Jews who were alive in Europe in 1945, are exempt from the requirement to pay taxes on reparations received from Germany. There is no other exemption from income for any other Americans. Since the reparations don’t count as income, they are also not included in the calculation of benefits like Medicaid, meaning that a Jewish 'survivor' can have a relatively high income and still receive benefits actually intended for those who are indigent.

**** Did you know there was a Special Envoy for U.S. Holocaust Survivor Services in the United States federal government?

President Obama long has said that, as Americans, we must look out for each other and exemplify the values expressed in the adage – I am my brother’s keeper

That is why Vice President Biden announced last December [2013] that the Administration is undertaking a targeted effort to support the needs of Holocaust survivors living in the United States.

[…]

As Vice President Biden said to an audience last December, “The Jewish community has been leading this [work] for decades.  The President and I have decided it’s time for us to step up and build on your efforts.”

Jonathan Greenblatt (left, currently head of the ADL-Anti Defamation League) was Special Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Social Innovation and Civic Participation in the Domestic Policy Council.

The task of the Special Envoy was to “implement policy so that Holocaust survivors should age in place and avoid the institutional care that health providers and government services generally recommend for the infirm.” That means providing special benefits for survivors that other Americans do not receive, which includes expensive in-home care paid for by the taxpayer.

**** The State Department also has a  Special Envoy to Identify and Combat Anti-Semitism, which “advances U.S. foreign policy on Anti-Semitism,” whatever that is supposed to mean, as combating anti-Semitism is not a foreign policy and would not appear to be a vital national interest of the United States. President Donald Trump proposed doing away with this position when he came into office, but the Jewish Lobby raised such a fuss that Congress demanded it remain.

**** Israel runs a large trade surplus with the United States because it has free access to the U.S. market and can also bid on government contracts, a privilege normally afforded only to NATO allies.

**** Washington foots the bill for more than 20% of Israeli defense spending, even allowing Israel to use American taxpayer provided dollars to buy weapons from its own [Israeli] defense industry, which competes with that of the U.S.

But we don't hear President Trump complaining about that as he complains about other countries!

**** The omnibus spending bill that was signed into law on March 23 this year gave Israel additional money for its “defense” while money for the Palestinians was cut dramatically.

**** Amazingly, twenty-four US states are now requiring statements pledging not to boycott Israel from those citizens and organizations that receive government funding or even seek local government employment. This is blatant government special-treatment backing of Israel's interests.

**** Two bills in Congress also seek to define as 'anti-Semitism' any criticism of Israel:

On December 12, 2017 the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act  was approved by the House of Representatives with 402 affirmative votes and only two libertarian-leaning congressmen voting “no.”

The Israel Anti-Boycott Act that is also currently making its way through the Congress would far exceed what is happening at the state level and would set a new standard for deference to Israeli interests on the part of the national government. It would criminalize any U.S. citizen “engaged in interstate or foreign commerce” who supports a boycott of Israel or who even goes about “requesting the furnishing of information” regarding it, with penalties enforced through amendments of two existing laws, the Export Administration Act of 1979 and the Export-Import Act of 1945, that include potential fines of between $250,000 and $1 million and up to 20 years in prison.

**** A U.S. government employee was actually fired for revealing information that might embarrass* the Jewish state.

A former Los Alamos National Lab nuclear policy specialist James Doyle was fired after he wrote in an article for the International Institute for Strategic Studies journal that “Nuclear weapons did not deter Iraq from attacking Israel during the 1991 Gulf War.” The article had been cleared for publication but an unnamed congressional staffer (Jew) spotted it and complained. A second review was made and “Doyle’s pay was cut, his home computer searched and he was fired.”

Doyle’s crime was to break the “legislative rule” that no federal government employee can confirm that Israel has nuclear weapons. The rule is ridiculous as the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal is well attested. [Recently even President Trump spoke about them.] What is okay for some is not okay for others.

*The reason for acute Israeli sensitivity on its nukes is the Symington Amendment in Section 101 of the U.S. Arms Export Control Act of 1976 which bans foreign aid to any country that has nuclear weapons and has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Which means that Israel’s annual $3.1 billion in aid might be in jeopardy if Washington were to enforce its own laws, though one cannot imagine that President Donald Trump or the Attorney General will take the necessary steps to do so.

**** The so-called Leahy Amendment is also not enforced against Israel, even by Senator Leahy (Jewish). It prohibits the U.S. Department of State and Department of Defense from providing military assistance to foreign security force units that violate human rights “with impunity.” Israel’s numerous brutal assaults on Gaza, including the current one in which it is shooting dead unarmed demonstrators, are textbook cases for when the Leahy Amendment should be applied, but, of course, it never will be.

* * *

All this favoritism and breaking of our laws is taking place at the same time that US Jews and Israel complain bitterly of victimization and demand more money, more aid, more protection, more special treatment via special laws. Something has to give here. Write to the White House and tell President Trump that you do NOT appreciate his unwavering support for Israel's interests, but especially write to your Congress-persons and give them a piece of your mind about their consistent unanimous vote in favor of anything to do with Israel, Jews, antisemitism and holocaust. Let them know that you know that much of it is unconstitutional and they are breaking our laws. If we were organized we could bring Articles of Impeachment against some of them. Since we are totally bereft of leadership or organization, all we can do is lobby the government by making our views known. Pay attention to what your Representative is doing. Stay informed and up to date. If we can't do that, we don't deserve to prevail and we won't.

Comments

This makes me sick beyond belief. These badtatds should have to prove they were holohoax survivors. But then that would open a whole can of worms in and of itself. 

It's supposed to make you sick, Jon. It makes me sick too, which is why I posted this. I want people to feel sick and do something. Fact is, most Americans don't think Jews are enough of a problem - they think Jews  are an asset to this country overall! The Jewish controlled media tells them that every day. What would we do without them, they think. We'd sink.

Our jew-wise writers and movement people are too soft on the Jews - much too soft. We need to be extremely firm - not stupid, but firm. Just think: At Charlottesville, when they chanted "they will not replace us" for a short time, it was seized upon as some kind of call for genocide of everyone who was not "us." So they keep us walking on eggshells while they walk all over us.

Read about Patrick Little - a real warrior. Now if we had about 20 of him doing what he's doing, we'd be on our way.

I've read the note and he's depicted as usual as "far-right, anti-semitic", with such press about him, has he any chance ??

As I said, if we had 20 like him, doing just as he's doing, it would be powerful.

Did you ever hear the saying attributed to Alex Linder (or his team): "No Way Out Except Through The Jews"? Think about that for a year or two; it might dawn on you.

Here's Little talking to a Yahoo reporter. He's very good at it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrYvnsA5hlU

carolyn...I would not put to much behind this guy little. I say most of these guys are put up there by jews to make white nationalists against the jews to look like idiot cavemen that no one will vote for

Yes, I watched a longer interview with him last night and became a little concerned. It was Part 2 with Brian Ruhe - I couldn't find Part 1 - and it was too long bc he talked on and on about himself and couldn't seem to stop. Course that was Brian's fault, he let him go on and didn't focus the interview.  https://www.bitchute.com/video/hMB5TGTCVd6V/

What bothered me most was Patrick Little mentioned Hitler again and again, and then mentioned David Duke as if in the same breath afterward. It was always Hitler and David Duke. What has David Duke to do with Hitler? But Little seemed to think so. Unfortunately, Brian didn't question that.

Little also had what seemed like blood on a small piece of tissue on his chin -- like you do when you cut yourself shaving. That was very distracting to me cause for awhile I thought it was a big mole. But I just checked pictures of him and his chin is clear and smooth.

He seems very smart, knowledgeable and sincere. Not an idiot caveman type at all. But quite the talker. So we'll keep watching him.

Yes, Congress has bowed to Jews for over one hundred years, and U.S. citizens has reelected a majority of 435 Representatives of the House in Congress "every two years".

Allan, this leads me to something I've been thinking about - that is, how 'civic nationalism' has failed in the United States. It has led this country to terrible tensions and expenses, and we're on the brink of breaking apart. The only form that works is ethnic nationalism.

What do you think?

The  nationalist groups I know of are Christians and advovate armed revolution. A religious agenda, or armed revolution, cannot keep the Republic. The only shot left for "citizens" to keep the Republic is to quit reelecting a majority of 435 Incumbent Representatives of the House in Congress every two years, Article I, Section 2, Clause 1, 
Maybe citizens could win an armed revolution but the Republic couldn't win an armed revolution.
 The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States,
 

Carolyn, thank you for putting a fire under our butts to take some action by writing our Congress critters and the U.S. President.  You gave us a lot of good fodder for saying just the right things to these Washington delegates what it is we need to say about Jewish favoritism.  The hard part, however, was not the writing. (You greatly helped making that easy.)  The hard part is believing they care at all what we think.  Such is the great gap between Them versus Us.

Thanks, Joey. The thing is, if they got enough mail about it, they would care. I don't mean a million emails, but even with 500 on the topic to the White House, they would take notice.

With House members, it's true you would need to have at least a hundred people in your district write in order to make a big impact, but that's not impossible. Of course if you have a super-liberal representative, or a jewish one, like you do, there is no point. We should go after the Republicans.

I don't think any mail to our elected representatives is wasted, though, even if they're on the opposite side. I suspect many won't write to politicians because they'd have to give their real name, address and phone number. Look at the courageous example Patrick Little is setting (reply to Fabio above).

I wonder with the idea that you can chose your own identity, a man can be a woman, and now even a white man chosing to be a Philipino Woman, if it might be expediant if we all identified as 90 year old Jews.  Or how about if we all identified as Jewish Mothers who survived the so called holocaust?  No one can prove you wrong.  Please, government, send me my reparations?  Do you think that would fly?  Just an idea. 

I think its very humorous if it could be gotten to the right people and publications. A brilliant idea. But the drawback is that it would be so repulsive to "switch" to identifying as a Jewish survivor that no one wants to do it, including me.

Totally agree.  It is replusive for honest people to claim reparations on the bodies of the dead, especially when the whole thing is a lie.  And the least hint that it was false would alarm an honest man to insist on getting at the truth, or at least an open forum.   Not to seek the truth is against any notion of God.   What kind of people would do that?  

You missed my point. I'm not talking about honesty, but about it being too repulsive to identify as a Jew. The repulsiveness of the Jew, not of dishonesty.

So much for equlity before the law.