"The International Jew" Study Hour - Episode 41

Published by carolyn on Thu, 2013-04-04 16:39
 
00:00

April 4, 2013

Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott read and comment on Chapter 37, Disraeli – British Premier, Portrays the Jews.”

Jews complain of “misrepresentation” whenever they are portrayed as they really are.  But one man, a Jew and one-time Prime Minister of Great Britain, Benjamin Disraeli, (pictured right) did portray Jews in many ways “as they are” and has not been criticized for it, but highly praised by Jews.

He wrote a novel, Coningsby, in which a character named Sidonia appears as a type of Rothschild Jew of shrewd intellect and secret power. In this portrait, TIJ thinks that Disraeli told the truth about Jews and their financial involvement in revolutions and wars. This chapter touches on Freemasonry, the Protocols, and the Jesuits.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Comments

11 Responses

  1. Liza

    April 5, 2013 at 8:18 am

    For the record, most Christian Identity does NOT believe present day “Jews” are the OT Hebrews…they believe them to be Edomites, etc. British Israel may be another matter, believing the present day “Jews” to be remnants of Judah. I am neither CI or BI, but I have studied their writings. Racial battles aside, the “Jews’” identity rests solely in the doctrines of the Talmud (and often Kabbalah). It is predominantly a toxic religion which strives to use the cover of “race”, “culture”, and “nation” when their religion is called into account.

  1. Hadding

    April 5, 2013 at 5:00 pm

    For the record, most Christian Identity does NOT believe present day “Jews” are the OT Hebrews…they believe them to be Edomites, etc. British Israel may be another matter,

    British Israelism is indeed a different matter. That was my point.

  1. Thomas Gaffney

    April 6, 2013 at 7:32 am

    It’s amazing how many of them there are running our country (England)…

  1. Carolyn

    April 6, 2013 at 10:20 am

    The following came to me in an email. I’m not sure what section 22 refers to, but if it’s Chapt. 22 that is too far back to comment on anyway. I don’t think Michel is a native English speaker so I’ve made a couple corrections for clarity, which I put in brackets.

    Dear Carolyn,

    In section 22 IJS Hadding Scott notes that the Jews are not focused on objective reality and we people from North Europe do, we cling to truth, which is the reason – [according] to Hadding – that we just can’t behave like Jews do. But I really think that Scott is wrong on this point. The Jews are to the extreme focused on a materialistic outlook of life. That’s the reason why they are the masters of finance, industry etc. They are criticised for having no ideals except wordly ones; they are precisely the opposite of those peoples who have ideals like the mentioned peoples from North Europe. This crushing of ideals is therefore their clinging to objectivity to the extreme, the basis of so much anti-Semitism. Of course, this is mixed with self-interest and hiding the truth in so many ways. So there is no people [with] so much attachment to this world – objectively – than the Jews. I hope you understand what I try to say. Please can you forward my remark to Hadding? I hope he can add something to it or contradict it with some facts.

    Kind regards,

    Michel

  1. Hadding

    April 6, 2013 at 2:35 pm

    Michel’s fundamental error seems to be that he equates being objective with being materialistic.

    Then he refers to the Jews’ “self-interest and hiding the truth in so many ways,” which means that Jews are highly subjective.

    There is no contradiction about being simultaneously materialistic and subjective.

  1. Carolyn

    April 7, 2013 at 12:09 am

    Michel seems to be trying to find the right words to say that Jews are focused on the outside world of money and objects; they don’t value ideals like Northern Europeans do, thus they “crush” our ideals and this is why we dislike them (antisemitism). He sounds kind of like Horst Mahler, yes? You notice in this interview that Michael Friedmann, the Jew, is touchy, but not reflective or subjective. He’s after getting Mahler to say certain things.

    I don’t know if attachment to objects is “objectivity” though. I don’t think so. Nor would I say that self-interest and hiding the truth is “subjectivity.” I do think that Europeans are far more subjective (reflective and spiritual?) than Jews and I think there is a contradiction between materialistic and subjective.

  1. Hadding

    April 7, 2013 at 1:31 am

    Everybody deals with objects to some degree. Calculation about material objects of particular concern is the most primitive form of objectivity.

    A higher level of objectivity is to understand whatever order naturally exists in the world, without regard to how it affects particular interests.

  1. David

    April 7, 2013 at 12:32 pm

    British Israelism is part of the reason the stupid Brits turned on their true White brethren in Germany!!! Christian Identity has nothing to do with BI EXCEPT that it actually follows through with the full history of Whites being the true Israelites and the Jews being the mongrels that weaseled their way in to our race and civilization. The Jews have been responsible for many of these other “movements”, like the Hussites, and Martin Luther. Martin Luther smartened up and wrote a book about the way the Jews were lying to gain advantage through him. Modern Lutherans should pay attention!!!

  1. Michel

    April 7, 2013 at 4:47 pm

    Hadding writes: “A higher level of objectivity is to understand whatever order naturally exists in the world, without regard to how it affects particular interests.” Indeed, but it was not precisely what I wanted to point out, namely the philosophical meaning of “objective”: that only this world of the senses exists and is the only real world. In other words, if you accept this material world as the only world for real, there is not much left for abstract ideals, no metaphysics etc. you can focus on. Doesn’t this explain a lot of the success of worldly Jewry? Finance, economics, media, worldly power in many fields. They live too much in the “real world”, the world of the senses. What do you think Hadding? Thanks for your reply.

  1. Hadding

    April 7, 2013 at 7:22 pm

    namely the philosophical meaning of “objective”: that only this world of the senses exists and is the only real world. In other words, if you accept this material world as the only world for real, there is not much left for abstract ideals, no metaphysics etc. you can focus on. Doesn’t this explain a lot of the success of worldly Jewry? Finance, economics, media, worldly power in many fields. They live too much in the “real world”, the world of the senses. What do you think Hadding? Thanks for your reply.

    Jews owe their success in the West to organized and aggressive pursuit of their interests against unorganized individualists who look at the world more from a universal perspective rather than strictly in terms of their own interests.

  1. David

    April 7, 2013 at 11:06 pm

    In all honesty Hadding, the problem we face with the Jews is the absolute stupidity of the great part of our people. I drink tap water and I am not brain dead like most of the people I know, so I don’t know if I buy the fluoride thing anymore. White people are just plain stupid. I went to dinner with my parents and uncle and aunt today and not only were they bitching about; Korea, and how that guy is nuts (I got into an argument about how what they do is none of our business, that WE have been antagonizing them for over 50 years, and that China is their ally and we would have to deal with THEM; how Obama is taking benefits away from the troops and I got into an argument over the fact that Bush did the same (everything is Obama’s fault don’t you know), and I started a skirmish with my father over his making the asinine statement that we had to get involved in WW2 to stop ….. Communism!!!! Which I tried to point out took half the world BECAUSE we got involved. Not for nothing my mother and uncle were in children in Prague during the war and my uncle was even in the Hitler Jungend!!! But even to them, the materialism and the idea of “freedom”, regardless of how degenerate it has become, entitles us to go around threatening and invading other countries. They can actually bitch about the Korean leader and justify attacking them while despising Obongo and not considering what it is WE push through the degenerate Jewish culture, or lack thereof, we embrace here.

    Americans, indeed many if not most Whites are ignorant, degenerate scum who have time and again served as the world’s best cannon fodder. And THAT is why Christian Identity makes perfect sense to me and why WE are indeed the idiots of the Old Testament, we screw up over and over and over again. It has to be us, the “Jews” have never been that stupid, the only thing that has ever kept them in check were brief periods in which our people smartened up for a time and then the Jews managed to get other idiots to help them.