Jews

German court carries out Jewish vengence on former SS guard

Published by carolyn on Fri, 2016-06-17 13:08

FEAR OF THE JEWS IS THE REASON FOR THE HARSH SENTENCE OF 5 YEARS IMPRISONMENT GIVEN TODAY BY THE COURT IN DETMOLD, Germany against the 94-year-old former Auschwitz guard, Reinhold Hanning. All of the plaintiffs are Jews who lied outrageously in court about what they experienced in the WWII camp. The World Jewish Congress president Ronald Lauder (son of Estee Lauder, cosmetics titan) was naturally asked what he thought of the sentence; he said it was “fair.”

These are the historical errors the court accepts without question, nor could anyone question them:

1) That Auschwitz was a “killing machine.”

It was a labor camp, and Birkenau was a concentration camp for those who couldn't work, including mothers with young children and entire gypsy families. No one was “killed” there but some were executed for cause, some died of natural causes, and many died of typhus.

Further evidence that Joshua Kaufman is lying about being Auschwitz prisoner 109023

Published by carolyn on Fri, 2016-06-03 23:42

By Carolyn Yeager

JUST LIKE ELIE WIESEL, Joshua Kaufman’s claimed Auschwitz number doesn’t fit his own story of how and when he could have been assigned it.

At the end of my previous article on Kaufman (at left in 2015), I asked readers to join me in demanding answers from him about his claim to be Auschwitz number 109023. He said to reporters in the courtroom in Detmold, Germany, as quoted by NBC News:

Can you imagine working in a crematorium, when you are only 15 years old? I had to break the bones of the dead to get them untangled … I am not Joshua Kaufman, I am number 109023.”

I heard nothing from Kaufman, but I did hear from Carlo Mattogno, the accomplished Italian revisionist. Carlo looked up the numbers and helpfully sent me the following information (my bolding): Continue reading at Elie Wiesel Cons The World

Martin Gray: Another Polish Jew surlievor* who wanted his people to be seen as heroic

Published by carolyn on Sat, 2016-05-14 01:15

Martin Gray in old age. Throughout his life as an entrepreneur, he wrote a number of books, but his most famous one was written by someone else.

 By Carolyn Yeager

When I myself told Gray, the “author”, that he had manifestly never been to, nor escaped from Treblinka, he finally asked, despairingly: “But does it matter?” Wasn’t the only thing that Treblinka did happen, that it be written about, and that some Jews should be shown to have been heroic? -Gitta Sereny, holocaust historian

The French writer Martin Gray, known for his autobiographical book For those I loved, was found dead in the pool of his house in Ciney, Belgium on 25 April 2016 at the age of 93.

So read the newspaper report when his death was announced. But French? Martin Gray was born Mieczysław Grajewski on the 27th of April, 1922 in Warsaw, which made him 17-years old when the Germans and Russians invaded Poland in 1939. Yet in his “autobiographical” book he is only 14 years of age in that year.

September 1939: the month of my real birth. I know almost nothing of the previous fourteen years. [page 3]

Lowering your age is in the tradition of holocaust surliever stories. Elie Wiesel removed a year from his real-life age in his “autobiographical” Night. He took 3 years off his younger sister’s age—she went from ten to seven. Paul Argeiwicz, whom I recently wrote about, reduced his age by five years, from 16 to eleven. It goes in the other direction too. There is a holocaust surlievor in the news recently who claims to be 112 years old. He lives in Israel. I don’t believe for a minute he is that old; he doesn’t look it but gives credit to a “positive attitude.” More likely, he got different papers after the war. There is also a female surlievor who claims she is 97, but looks more like 79. (More pictures here.) They all have some purpose in fiddling with their age – Continue reading at Elie Wiesel Cons The World

*Note: Surlievor = a survivor who lies about what he/she survived.

Wiesel archivist finds another version of “Night” – now there are six!

Published by carolyn on Sun, 2016-05-08 16:26

Elie Wiesel, right, in his office at Boston University with his Israeli editor and archivist, Joel Rappel, who announced the discovery of a Hebrew version of “Night” in an exclusive report to Haaretz.

By Carolyn Yeager

The controversy about the origins of “Night” is given more fuel by the recent announcement of Dr. Joel Rappel that he found a 150-page, handwritten document in Hebrew in the unsorted mass of Elie Wiesel’s personal papers.

I wrote about Yoel Rappel’s relationship with Elie Wiesel two years ago. Wiesel selected this Israeli journalist, editor and media expert he has known for decades to have control over how his writings and life story will be presented to the public – meaning what will be presented and what withheld. While Boston University is going to house the Wiesel Archive, it is not in control of it. Wiesel brought Dr. Rappel to Boston, put him on the payroll as “visiting scholar”, then put him in in charge of the Wiesel archive project.

I will go into some detail about this “newly discovered document” but first I want to list the six (oh, that number always comes up, doesn’t it?) versions of Night. They are:

1) 1954 – The original Yiddish manuscript, 862 typed pages, (No one has ever seen this, but more on that later)

2) 1955 – The edited and published Yiddish Un di velt hot geshvign – 245 book pages (in Hebrew characters, not our alphabet)

3) 1958 – La Nuit, original French – about 120 pages

4) 1960 – Night in English, Stella Rodway translation from French – 107 pages

5) 2006 – Night in English, Marion Wiesel new translation with numerous changes – 112 pages

6) late 1950’s, discovered in 2016 – Night in Hebrew, handwritten by Elie Wiesel – 150 pages (unfinished? – no one has seen this one either) Continue reading at Elie Wiesel Cons The World

Hate and the Holocaust on Israel's Yom Ha'shoah Day

Published by carolyn on Thu, 2016-05-05 19:41

By Carolyn Yeager

In honor of Yom Ha'shoah on this May 5, 2016, MSN News runs a story they picked up from the Mail&Guardian, a British South African newspaper, titled “Holocaust a grim reminder of dangers of allowing racial hatred to run wild.” The key words in that title are “racial hatred.” This is the message the Jews are trying very, very hard to establish as a “problem” for the entire Western world. And of course, for them it all goes back to persecution of Jews which over time led to “the Holocaust.” A tidy story we're all familiar with.

But pay attention! It's the expression of racial hatred that is the problem. Because, of course you can't stop people from disliking other people, but they can be stopped from expressing that dislike. This is what was enforced in the Soviet Union after the Russian revolution in 1917 and again in defeated Germany after 1945. Jews, especially, have to be protected since, as a race, they work against the interests of the national people in whatever country they're in, and thus are highly disliked.

Ted Cruz signs Senate letter demanding more money for Israel

Published by carolyn on Fri, 2016-04-29 21:26

EIGHTY-THREE OF THE 100 SENATORS, including Ted Cruz (above), have signed a letter demanding that Israel be given more cash than ever before.

The letter—which originated with the American Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC), one of the US’s most prominent Jewish lobbies, urges a more “robust” defense package for Israel, and has so far gathered the signatures of 51 Republican and 32 Democrat senators.

The letter, addressed to President Obama, says that, in “light of Israel’s dramatically rising defense challenges, we stand ready to support a substantially enhanced new long-term agreement to help provide Israel the resources it requires to defend itself and preserve its qualitative military edge.”  Equality is not good enough for Israel, it requires a vastly superior military technology in order to hold its own.

Category 

2016 US elections, Jews

Survivor stories are a genre that prove the “Holocaust” is a Jewish hoax

Published by carolyn on Sun, 2016-04-24 15:44

Paul Argiewicz proudly shows off his Auschwitz tattoo which is his best proof he is a holocaust survivor. But it’s the details of his story that are suspect, as is true of all surliever stories.

By Carolyn Yeager

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN a survivor story that passes the test of truth and accuracy – not one! Isn’t that amazing? They are all filled with exaggerations and downright lies. And that really tells us something, because “the Holocaust” is in actuality nothing more than a collection of survivor stories. I am not an expert in revisionist historiography, but I think I can say with confidence that no scientific/forensic evidentiary support for a “Holocaust” exists. Documentary support is both sparse and dependent on questionable or uncertain interpretations. That leaves us with witness accounts from those who were in the concentration and work camps to tell us what “the Holocaust” was.

It’s been known for a long time that eye-witnesses are the least reliable evidence for what really happened in any given situation. Forensic evidence is the best, and even circumstantial evidence is superior to eye-witness. The stories that were told by false eye-witnesses in 1945-46 were outlandish compared to what we believe today. Far-fetched and grotesque accusations of sadistic methods of killing were made against camp authorities and guards and then soberly reported in the world’s news outlets. Continue reading at Elie Wiesel Cons The World

“Child survivor” Paul Argiewicz and the missing five years

Published by carolyn on Sun, 2016-04-17 11:06

This is a picture of Paul Argiewicz used by the Wisconsin Veterans Museum but with no description. Considering he’s wearing a US Army cap, it’s probably from after 1950, which would make him over 25 years of age.

By Carolyn Yeager

Remember Paul Argiewicz? He's the guy I wrote about here because it's widely claimed he's in the Famous Buchenwald Liberation Photo, which he is not. But there are a lot of things wrong with the Paul Argiewicz story – claiming he is in that photo is just one of them.

Christine Miller has observed that being forced to believe holocaust survivor's stories has made Western man irrational. Paul's story is as irrational as any, especially when it comes to the simple act of adding together two-digit numbers. So let's start there.

Paul's date of birth is always given as Aug. 6, 1925 in Bielsko, Poland. He grew up using his mother's name, Argiewicz, because his parents were not formally or officially married. The family included two older sisters. He told interviewers that he only went three and a half years to grade school. He was arrested in 1941 by his own reckoning, when he would have been 16 years old.

However, his story, wherever you look either online or in the book about him, states that he was age 11 at the time of his arrest by the Nazis, and in his own obituary written or approved by his family it says “he was arrested at age 10 by the SS for stealing bread for his starving family in the Jewish ghetto.” [The 'stealing bread for starving family' part is obviously fiction, but Paul was known as an emotional person who cried easily and liked to create as much emotional reaction in his listeners as possible.] Continue reading at Elie Wiesel Cons The World

Bernie Sanders again plays the 'Holocaust' card in defense of Muslim immigration

Published by carolyn on Mon, 2016-04-04 22:37

By Carolyn Yeager

ON APRIL 2ND IN MILWAUKEE (a city settled by German immigrants), 'Democratic Socialist' presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was berating Republican candidate Donald Trump for calling for a temporary ban on non-US-citizens who are Muslim from entering the USA. Sanders likened Trump to a “lunatic,” after calling him "a nutcase" just a week before.

The Washington Post reported that on Saturday, the Senator from Vermont indicated he was against intolerance toward Muslims, explaining that some of his relatives [allegedly] died “in the Holocaust” because “a lunatic … stirred up racial hatred:”

30 Years Later: The No-Pardon Pardon of Leo Frank

Published by carolyn on Wed, 2016-03-16 21:20

This month, March of 2016, is the 30th anniversary of the granting of a limited pardon to Leo Frank. Read here about how it came about and what it means.

by John Pierson and Vanessa Neubauer

IN 1983 — 70 years after the conviction of sex killer and Atlanta B’nai B’rith president Leo Max Frank for the murder of Mary Phagan — lawyers associated with the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the Atlanta Jewish Federation and the American Jewish Committee tried to obtain a pardon for Frank. (ILLUSTRATION: Leo Frank gives a big smile for the camera just two days after the murder of Mary Phagan. The snapshot was published the next day, April 29, 1913 on the cover of the Atlanta Journal. It was taken at a time when it was widely believed that a Black man, Newt Lee, would be charged with the crime.)

The ADL based their claims almost entirely on the 1982 affidavit of Frank’s office boy, Alonzo Mann, who took 69 years to reverse his trial testimony. Mann, elderly and with mounting medical bills, created a media sensation when he averred — contrary to what he had testified in 1913 — that he had seen another man (Frank’s janitor and accessory after the fact Jim Conley) carrying Mary Phagan’s body on the day of her murder.

Category 

Jews, Race, Sexual perversion

Pages