Holocaust Revisionism

The Holocaust and the conundrum of self-blame

Published by carolyn on Mon, 2016-05-02 02:12

By Carolyn Yeager

The release of Eric Hunt's new Holocaust revisionist film Questioning The Holocaust: Why We Believed, Part 1” has brought to the fore some disagreements within the revisionist community. Nothing too unusual because they've always been there, but interestingly, it spills over, just by chance, to include the Alt-Right community too.

What I'm speaking of is revisionist Michael Hoffman's complaint to and about Eric Hunt, and also Kevin MacDonald's recent article posted at The Occidental Observer titled, “Northern Europeans less prone to “blaming the other.” These separate items come together in the question of “Who is to blame” for the problems facing White European peoples in the 21st century.

When it comes to the “Holocaust”, the so-called Alternative Right de facto position (wherein I place Kevin MacDonald) is that Hitler was responsible and all we can do is admit it and move on. It does no good to waste any time on it.

Eric Hunt's latest film released today - view it online

Published by carolyn on Mon, 2016-04-25 19:36

Filmmaker Eric Hunt has released his latest documentary film today, Monday, April 25, on a new website: Questioning The Holocaust.com.  It is the first in a series that will appear under that heading. I would describe this film as a basic primer with the intention of reaching those who were indoctrinated with Holocaust education throughout their school years, and may have had some questions they were afraid to ask. Now they can learn about it from a different perspective and get some answers that weren't available to them in their school setting.

The film is appropriately named Questioning "The Holocaust" - Why We Believed.  It is Part 1 of 2, with the second part coming at a later date. Part 1 focuses on that very question of why we all started out believing, even swallowing the popular conception of "fake shower rooms" into which Jews were allegedly lured only to experience deadly hydrogen-cyanide gas coming out of the shower heads instead of water. That explains the neat graphic of the shower head attached to a pipe in the shape of a question mark. Of course, if the gas killed them all, who was there to tell such a story? Well, there are "survivors" who said they "escaped from the gas chamber" but it was really a rumor that circulated among the inmates in several camps - and we learn how this rumor became a belief.

Survivor stories are a genre that prove the “Holocaust” is a Jewish hoax

Published by carolyn on Sun, 2016-04-24 15:44

Paul Argiewicz proudly shows off his Auschwitz tattoo which is his best proof he is a holocaust survivor. But it’s the details of his story that are suspect, as is true of all surliever stories.

By Carolyn Yeager

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN a survivor story that passes the test of truth and accuracy – not one! Isn’t that amazing? They are all filled with exaggerations and downright lies. And that really tells us something, because “the Holocaust” is in actuality nothing more than a collection of survivor stories. I am not an expert in revisionist historiography, but I think I can say with confidence that no scientific/forensic evidentiary support for a “Holocaust” exists. Documentary support is both sparse and dependent on questionable or uncertain interpretations. That leaves us with witness accounts from those who were in the concentration and work camps to tell us what “the Holocaust” was.

It’s been known for a long time that eye-witnesses are the least reliable evidence for what really happened in any given situation. Forensic evidence is the best, and even circumstantial evidence is superior to eye-witness. The stories that were told by false eye-witnesses in 1945-46 were outlandish compared to what we believe today. Far-fetched and grotesque accusations of sadistic methods of killing were made against camp authorities and guards and then soberly reported in the world’s news outlets. Continue reading at Elie Wiesel Cons The World

Jack Sen, Nick Griffin agree it's best not to talk about the 'Holocaust'

Published by carolyn on Sun, 2016-03-27 14:32

By Carolyn Yeager

I RECENTLY WATCHED the new video interview: “Nick Griffin interview with Jack Sen – Part 1.” There are three parts, all available now, although I have only watched Part 1, which I came upon posted at The Occidental Observer (TOO). Skimming through it, I was struck by the conversation between the two men about Holocaust, so later I settled down to watch all of Part 1.

For background, Jack Sen is a British citizen who is one-quarter East Indian** and has written four articles for TOO to date, his latest being an attack on the Dresden, Germany-based PEGIDA, calling it a Zionist organization. According to his article, Sen got involved with the PEGIDA-UK Facebook page editors and watched them cave in to Jewish money, thus has created an organization of his own he named “British Renaissance.” Interesting that his BR logo was designed for free by the PEGIDA-UK webmaster before he left. I was put-off by this article for the reason that it was the second anti-Pegida essay published at TOO that I have read – the first being an attack on Tommy Robinson and Pegida-UK by another Britain-booster and regular contributor, Francis Carr Begbie. My impression of Begbie is that he never met a German that he liked. In this article he claimed that an Israeli flag was prominently displayed at every PEGIDA rally – absolutely false! I've never seen one and I watch them all. So when either of these two men write about Germany, it's clear to me they just don't have a clue and should stick to something they actually know about.

[**Correction - Sen is 1/2 East Indian; his father is Bengali and his sister uses the family name of Sengupta. See here]

Paypal shuts down my account

Published by carolyn on Mon, 2016-03-21 18:22

So it has now come to me. I didn't even understand what they were talking about when I first realized that this was serious. Paypal doesn't speak in plain language. Their message said my account had been permanently limited “because some of your recent transactions violated the [Paypal User Agreement and Acceptable Use] policy” which I had signed. A “limitation” is Paypal's language for a ban. It means you can't send or receive funds.

I couldn't see any problem with my transactions; they were ordinary enough. I needed an explanation for how my transactions were at fault. When I got hold of a real person on the phone, it turned out it wasn't my transactions at all. It was my websites! And specifically in relation to “Holocaust” I was told. She said that was in the User Agreement I had signed.

Thomas Dalton has done it again!

Published by carolyn on Thu, 2016-03-17 20:27

Display of Copies of Hitler's Mein Kampf - Documentation Center in Congress Hall - Nuremberg-Nurnberg - Germany

Not only has he just published an exceptional article about Mein Kampf and Adolf Hitler, but Dalton reveals he is also working on a new English translation of Mein Kampf – a side-by-side German-English translation, no less! This is fantastic news. I think he had better make a big first print run when he publishes it because it will no doubt be highly desirable. He may become the first revisionist author to get rich on his work!

Everything Dalton has done to date has been outstanding, in my opinion. He is one of those writers who seems to want to truly enlighten his readers, so he puts the facts of the story first and gets himself out of the way. For this reason, and others, he is perfectly suited to do a new Mein Kampf translation we can have faith in.

The first revisionist work I know by Dalton is the well-known Debating the Holocaust: A New Look At Both Sides” (2009), which contrasts the “exterminationist” and the revisionist views in an impartial and thorough manner. The book was very successful, as holocaust revisionist books go.

Denial as a factor in Holocaust belief

Published by carolyn on Tue, 2016-03-15 02:11

Jakob Wendel speaks with reporters in the courtroom where he is testifying against Reinhold Hanning for the murder of 170,000 Jews. I couldn't discover whether he is a Jew but it's certainly possible.

By Carolyn Yeager

ON FRIDAY, March 11, a 92 year-old professional liar-witness named Jakob Wendel (ethnic roots uncertain) testified in a German court to things that cannot possibly be true. He said that defendant Reinhold Hanning had to have known that Auschwitz was an “extermination camp” because “I was there for two years (1942-44) and anyone who was there for that length of time knew what was happening there.” Wendel and Hanning were both SS guards at the camp but had never crossed paths.

This type of testimony is no more than an opinion, so Wendel went on to describe how, from his post in a watchtower, he saw trains pulling in and the people inside being marched off in the direction of the “gas chambers”. It just so happens that the people were going to showers and life-saving de-lousing procedures that were located where the fictitious “gas chambers” are claimed to have been. [Recall the false allegation of gas chambers disguised as shower rooms – this is how it got started.]

Part 2 of "Mark Weber: Squishy Semi-Revisionist Shirker" now at CODOH

Published by carolyn on Tue, 2016-03-08 17:31

Weber: "My view about the gas-chambers or gassings is the same essentially as David Irving. And I believe that Jews were gassed. Yes."

An aid to comprehension for viewers of Jim Rizoli's interview of Mark Weber (10 February 2016)

By Hadding Scott

In the first part, I showed that Mark Weber, in his interview with Jim Rizoli (10 February 2016), consistently tried to avoid acknowledging any findings of Holocaust Revisionism, and also tried to conceal his past acknowledgment of such findings. In this part, the focus is on Weber's attempts to justify his retreat from Holocaust Revisionism.

Mark Weber gives several arguments to justify his current refusal to support the revisionist findings that he once supported in regard to the Holocaust. I was able to discern the following, somewhat contradictory arguments, listed here in ascending order of absurdity:

1. The question of whether the Holocaust-story is true or false is no longer relevant.

2. Although the truth about the Holocaust is relevant (contradicting the previous point) it should not be relevant!

3. There is no point in disputing the Holocaust because Jews really were gassed. 

Please continue reading at CODOH

Critical review of Jim Rizoli's video interview of Mark Weber published at CODOH

Published by carolyn on Sun, 2016-02-28 12:52

l

Corrected edition cover of the book
Ernst Zundel was prosecuted for in the
1988 Canadian "False News" trial.

Hadding Scott's critical review is titled:

Mark Weber: Squishy Semi-Revisionist Shirker
An aid to comprehension for viewers of Jim Rizoli's interview of Mark Weber

Scott's opening explains why he thinks his review is necessary.

Bradley Smith, CODOH founder, has passed away

Published by carolyn on Fri, 2016-02-19 02:19

Bradley R. Smith is dead. What a shock. He somehow seemed indestructible, even though he was in frail health for several years. But he always bounced back from crises, returning to "the work", never losing his sharp wit and deep heart. So one got used to feeling he always would.

Bradley passed away on Thursday, Feb. 18, his 86th birthday, according to an announcement sent out by Germar Rudolf who is a volunteer at CODOH, the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust.

Pages