Jews

Jan. 24, 2013

Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott read and comment on Chapter 26:  The Scope of Jewish Dictatorship in the U.S.

How Bernard Baruch exercised power as the  “Jewish High Governor  of the United States in war affairs” and how Jews got richer through his influence. At the beginning of the chapter we are told  that Baruch himself expressed that he ‘got into the war’ at Plattsburg and ‘out of the war’ when the Paris Peace Conference ended. What was Plattsburg? At the outbreak of war in Europe in 1914, some “elite” super-patriots, including Teddy Roosevelt and Elihu Root, instigated what was called the Preparedness Movement, to set up military training camps for civilians. Several organizations sponsored marches and demonstrations in major cities.  Training camps were operated in Plattsburg, N.Y. in 1915 and 1916 serving 40,000 men mostly from elite social classes. These men were destined to become officers.

Pictured at right is the July 22, 1916 parade in San Francisco protesting Woodrow Wilson’s policy to not prepare for war.  A bomb exploded during this parade, killing 10 and injuring many more. The motive was to work up war hysteria. What part did Jews play in this?

At the 17min to 17:09 mark, the number of men trained should be 400,000, not 4,000 as said by Carolyn.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of  The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Oldies but Goodies

This early Heretics' Hour program from June 28, 2010, with Carolyn's favorite guest of all time Wilhelm Kriessmann, is too good to be forgotten and left back in the archives.

Wilhelm Kriessmann - The Detention Camps

Left: Wolfsberg main gate (click to enlarge)

Right: Auschwitz main gate (click to enlarge)

What was life like in the British-run Wolfsberg detention camp in Austria, where Wilhelm was detained soon after he found his way home from Northern Germany in September, 1945? How did it compare with the Auschwitz detention camp in Poland? Was it really any better ... or was it worse? After 9 months at Wolfsberg, he spent another 8 months detained at the similar, but much smaller Wetzelsdorf camp ... all without any charges ever laid against him.

Wikipedia writes:
By the middle of June only Russian prisoners remained, these were eventually exchanged for British and American PoWs in Russian hands, near Graz. The camp then served as a British detention center for ex-Nazis, before finally closing in mid-1947.

Wilhelm Kriessmann was a soldier, not a "Nazi"; he was never a Party member. I had to appeal to him as a friend to come on the show and talk about his camp experience, as it is not something he normally did. He was one of those "too-decent and uncomplaining" Germans when it came to speaking about his own treatment by the English and Americans. He felt he had not suffered nearly what so many others did, and thus it was not worth telling. I am glad for the sake of the historical record that we have his story, brief as it is.

Program begins with an Elie Wiesel update. 54 min

Jan. 21, 2013

Two men with very distinct personalities and followings meet each other for the first time on this program, revealing in the ensuing exchange that the division among White Nationalists over religion is deeper than any other disagreement. Will Williams, who was associated with William Pierce when he was alive, manages The Legacy of Dr. William Pierce and is a vehement foe of Christianity. William Finck is owner of Christogenea, a Christian Identity site, and it’s subdomain The Mein Kampf Project. Other topics discussed:

• Was Adolf Hitler a Christian, a nominal Christian, or anti-Christian?
• What sources for Hitler’s direct statements about religion are reliable?
• The Sandy Hook “shooting” as a pretext for strict gun control laws;
• How ordinary people can best lobby against the gun control legislation being pushed by the Obama administration;
• What kind of guns do ordinary people need to own for effective self-defence;
• The prevalence of false footage used in television news reports, as in a recent Anderson Cooper/CNN segment;
• David Duke makes cozy with Gordon Duff on his radio show;
• Public trust in government and business leaders is very low in a recent poll; time to take advantage of that?

Hadding Scott and Walt Hampton called in during the 2nd hour.

Jan. 19, 2013

Harlan Schulke is Carolyn’s guest to discuss what he considers to be very meaningful differences between translations of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion – the two main ones being the Victor Marsden and the Boris Brasol (or perhaps Natalie de Bogery) translations. Brazol’s translation was used for The International Jew by Henry Ford. In addition to comparing specific passages, Schulke made the following points:

• Just the fact that our government is filled with “dual-Israeli-U.S. citizens” reflects much that is written in the Protocols;
• Jewish nationalism is the term he prefers over “global conspiracy;”
• The source of Jewish nationalism is in the Old Testament book of Deuteronomy;
• The Protocols also throw light on the ritual murder accusations through the centuries.

Pictured right:  Boris Brazol, Russian monarchist expatriate credited with translating the Protocols, in a library after coming to the U.S. I could not find a picture that I was sure was Victor Marsden. Schulke rates the Brazol translation as inferior to that of Marsden.

Jan. 17, 2013

Pictured:  War Industries Board – The largest of the superagencies  during WW1 was headed by the financier Bernard Baruch. Of the seven members, three were Jews. Standing: Adm. F.F. Fletcher, Hugh Fraune, Col. Palmer E. Pierce, H.P. Ingels. Seated: Daniel Willard, Robert S. Brookings, Robert S. Lovett, and Bernard M. Baruch. Essentially, the WIB made purchases, allocated supplies, fixed prices at levels that business requested, and ordered the standardization of goods to save materials and streamline production. (e.g the varieties of automobile tires were reduced from 287 to 3)

Hadding Scott and Carolyn Yeager read and comment on Chapter 25, “Disraeli of America” – A Jew of Super-Power.

A look at the autocratic rule over the United States gained by the Jew Bernard Baruch, under the presidency of Democrat Woodrow Wilson,  as the man who “mobilized American industry for war.”

It is reported that he once said of himself, “Behold the Disraeli of the United States!” and told a Congressional committee, “I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true.” TIJ suggests that Baruch’s example of governing the country during the war gave his co-religionists a very valuable education in the art of autocracy.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of  The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Jan. 10, 2013

Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott read and comment on Chapter 24, The High and Low of Jewish Money Power.

Jewish high finance began in America with the Rothschilds and their agent August Belmont, who professed Christianity. Much of the veil of secrecy that held sway at that time, the mysterious magic surrounding large transactions between governments and individuals, has been stripped away. The Rothschild strategy has always been to bet on both sides so you never lose.

The large Jewish banking houses such as Kuhn, Loeb and Co. met resistance from the Gentile establishment of the day in their  effort to gain the upper hand in U.S. finance. This chapter also describes the lower and darker side of financial activity in this country, and relates the story of the shocking (at the time) Wall St. theft of $12,000,000 in bonds via an organized ring of mostly Russian Jews that began in 1918 and flourished until 1920. To things like this, there is complete silence from the upper level of Jewry. TIJ attributes the silence to the “racial instinct.”

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of  The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file. 

By Carolyn Yeager

Max Hamburger, a Jewish-Dutch psychiatrist, is the man in the above photograph taken in 2012. He is 92 years of age. The photo is blurry because it was retrieved from a pdf here that doesn’t allow to save it to one’s computer files.

Hamburger has identified himself as the fourth figure in the bottom row of the famous Buchenwald photo — the figure he is pointing to with his thumb. He was 25 years-old in April 1945 when the camp was “liberated” by American troops. I want you to notice right away the space between Hamburger’s nose and upper lip — it is unusually long. It can be more clearly determined by going to the pdf. The face of the young man in the famous photo does not have that long space, but just a normal, or even short, distance between nose and mouth. This is facial structure that doesn’t change, which tells me he is not the same person.

Born on February 10,  1920 in Amsterdam, Max began the study of medicine in 1938 and, as best I can make out from Dutch language sources,  he was arrested in 1942 because of his activism in the Dutch Resistance and sent to Westerbork, a camp for political prisoners in The Netherlands. He ended up in Auschwitz and then Buchenwald, he says, taking the usual route. According to this page, he was suffering from TB, and also malnutrition, when the famous photo he’s holding in his hands was taken.

The blurb on the Flicker page also says “he only survived Auschwitz because he could work as a medical assistant.” One has to ask about all those who didn’t work as a medical assistant, but also survived and went to Buchenwald … and survived Buchenwald too without being medical assistants! This is the kind of meaningless tripe we are always given to explain why people survived “death camps.”  This page also says he now (in 2008) lives in Belgium and gives talks about his wartime experiences. In other words, he advertises himself as a holocaust survivor who is in the Famous Buchenwald Liberation Photo, the one that Elie Wiesel is in. (See final section below)

It should be noted that Nicholas Grüner is in this photo too; he is the first person on the left in the bottom row and the only one of the three mentioned who actually looks like himself, and is himself. Yet the labeling of this photograph at Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem (below) gives three possible identities for this figure:  Gershon Blonder,  Josef Reich or Nicholas (Miklos) Grüner … as if it were in doubt. The other two are not shown to be in doubt:  the fourth figure on the bottom is Max Hamburger;  the seventh figure in the 2nd row is Elie Wiesel.  It’s clear to me that Yad Vashem will eventually deny that Nicholas Grüner is in the photo at all, and thus his claim that Elie Wiesel was not in the camp (or the photo) will be weakened. These people are nothing if not devious … and they accomplish their objective in a gradual manner. According to Yad Vashem …

Please continue reading this article at Elie Wiesel Cons The World

Jan. 3, 2013

Hadding Scott  and Carolyn Yeager read and comment on Chapter 23, Jew Versus Non-Jew in New York Finance.

The Jewish Problem can be studied best by their takeover of the city of New York, where in 1918, one Jew out of every 10 in the world resided. They took over the large department stores, men and women’s ready-to-wear apparel, laundries, furriers, general shopkeeping, the legal profession and the news stands. Of 27,000 stands, 25,000 were in the hands of Jews!

This chapter describes in helpful detail how they took over New York finance, too. Originally excluded, they slowly but persistently wormed their way into the Big Gentile Banks and seats on the NY Stock Exchange by hiding their Jewish identity behind Christian/Gentile names. The result is pictured above:  Senior Israeli and American Jewish leaders opened trading at the New York Stock Exchange on Nov. 20, 2011 in the presence of senior Israeli officials, Jewish leaders and guests from the America Israel Friendship League. The occasion was the 6th Annual “Israel Day” celebrated at the NYSE. Note the Israeli flag on the screen.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of  The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file. 

By Carolyn Yeager

Here we see a very bizarre scene of clothed men being photographed lying in bunks, while a naked man sits on a bench in front of them. They are not looking at him and he seems unaware of them. And why not? This is clearly a composite photograph made up of two unrelated scenes.

The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) titles this photo #78713 “Survivors lie on wooden bunks that are four tiers high in a barracks in the Buchenwald concentration camp.”

No mention of the naked man. This is truly fitting of the expression “the elephant in the living room” wherein everyone pretends not to notice something they can’t or don’t want to try to explain.

The description by the USHMM  goes on to say:

The original caption reads, “This photo shows the conditions and the amount of sleeping space for the prisoners at Buchenwald concentration camp. They range from young kids to old men, all doing the same amount of work each day.”

According to the Signal Corps caption, the photo was taken on April 23, 1945.

Yet the date above this description for the photo is: Wednesday, April 11, 1945 – Monday, April 23, 1945; the photographer Donald R. Ornitz; courtesy of Mary Dickinson.

April 11 was “Liberation Day” and they always want to give the impression that all the pictures were taken on that day … that everything seen is unrehearsed and just as the liberating army found it. Yet this photo was “set up” 12 days after liberation. Another point:  Where are the “old men,” and where are the “young kids” in this photo? They all look to be in their late teens and 20′s up to their 30′s at the most.  No old men, no young kids. What were these ex-’prisoners’ doing during those 12 days; where were they living? How were they being treated? Well, they were being asked to participate in the creation of the post-war propaganda ordered by Eisenhower, and that’s what they did. Were they paid? What were they promised? Did they just hang around in the barracks as usual?

The naked man and his strange shadow

The men in the bunks are not sick or emaciated – they appear healthy and alert – so the military intelligence division responsible for creating photographic propaganda decided to add a sick man to the photo in order to support the message they were charged to send to the world of sub-human conditions at Buchenwald. It’s not hard to see how they did it — the two men on the bench were super-imposed on the other picture. The top edge of the bench is lined up with the bottom slat of the bunk, giving the impression that the bench is some feet away from the bunk.

Continue reading this article at Elie Wiesel Cons The World