"The International Jew" Study Hour - Episode 9
August 23, 2012
Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott read and comment on Chapter 7, "Arthur Brisbane Leaps to the Help of Jewry."
Image: Arthur Brisbane in his newspaper office in New York. He was one of the best-known editors of the 20th Century -- becoming editor of William Randolf Hearst's New York Journal and a close friend of Hearst. His syndicated column had an estimated daily readership of over 20 million.
Brisbane's editorial of Sunday, June 20, 1920, titled "Facts: An Antidote to Prejudice," is the subject of this chapter which appeared in Ford's Dearborn Independent 2 weeks later on July 3, 1920.
Brisbane's editorial can be read here, as a reprint in the Canadian Jewish Chronicle of July 2, 1920. The front page of this edition of the Chronicle is also of interest, under "Poor Ford" where Henry Ford is described by the Jews as being either mentally unbalanced or mentally defective.
Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.
Category
International Jew Study podcast, JewsBookmark/Search this post with
- 823 reads
Comments
Original comments to this program
5 Responses
Allan Hampton
August 24, 2012 at 3:15 pm
Shame on you for not exposing the correct purpose of the Vote in Constitutional America. In Constitutional America citizen’s vote only applies to electing the “people/Officials” that will have the power to “legislate”. The citizenry’s vote cannot legislate (make law); Article I, Section 1. The citizenry’s vote cannot amend (change) the Constitution; Article V.
Carolyn
August 24, 2012 at 4:11 pm
This appears to be spam, Allan. Please don’t try to pass this off as a legitimate comment. Where/how does it apply?
Allan Hampton
August 25, 2012 at 12:59 pm
Carolyn, my comment applied to a comment in one of your broadcasts mentioning the “vote”. I think the comment stating the purpose of the vote was made in episode 9 of International Jew. The statement was something to the effect that voters vote for their personal benefit. That statement may be correct as to why voters vote but “personal enhancement” is not “constitutionally” the purpose of the federal vote.
My first message explained the “constitutional” purpose of the federal vote.
Nemeth
August 25, 2012 at 3:02 pm
Really enjoying this series. Just wanted to say thanks.
Carolyn
August 25, 2012 at 4:29 pm
Nemeth – Your thanks is much appreciated. As I say to Hadding after every show, I am enjoying it also. It’s interesting and fun for me to do.