On the preservation of the nation

Published by carolyn on Fri, 2020-08-21 14:32

The following was posted by me here on January 20, 2019. I'm reposting it in light of the current presidential campaign in the United States during which violent riots by Marxist Antifa and Black Lives Matter "protesters" are taking place in so many major American cities, witnessed by the entire world. Adolf Hitler predicted the racial divisions we're now experiencing and why they do not go away no matter how much good will is applied. Here are some excerpts, with my commentary in red, from his Jan. 30, 1937 speech in the Reichstag in Berlin. I welcome reader's comments (of reasonable length). -carolyn

“THE MAIN PLANK IN THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST PROGRAMME is to abolish the liberalistic concept of the individual and the Marxist concept of humanity and to substitute therefore the folk community, rooted in the soil and bound together by the bond of its common blood. A very simple statement; but it involves a principle that has tremendous consequences.” (P 10)

This very clear statement rules out that Adolf Hitler was any kind of a universalist when it comes to so-called white people and that he would not approve of the current European Union as it has been set up. At the time he said this (1937) he had not visualized a war that would turn Germany into the occupier of large portions of Europe. He was only visualizing German people being brought home into an expanded German Reich.

“[…] of all the tasks which we have to face, the noblest and most sacred for mankind is that each racial species must preserve the purity of the blood which God has given it.” (P 10)

This shows that Hitler saw his revolution as an internal, German event, not including all of Europe at all. His position was that others would show interest in it for themselves if it were successful in Germany.

“...one error that cannot be remedied once men have made it … failure to recognize the importance of conserving the blood and the race free from intermixture …

It is not for men to discuss the question of why Providence created different races, but rather to recognize the fact that it punishes those who disregard its work of creation.” (P 10)

Hitler sees it as a law of Nature rather than as an idea of men of which the pros and cons can be discussed. It is not up for discussion because it is an iron law, the breaking of which contains the punishment within itself.

“It will prevent the Jewish people from intruding themselves among all the other nations as elements of internal disruption, under the mask of honest world citizens, and thus gaining power over these nations.” (P 11)

Jews are the greatest source of disruption of the unity of a people, as proven by the rejuvenation of the German nation during the past four years since 1933.

“The people—the race—is the primary thing. Party, State, Army, the national economic structure, Justice, etc, all these are only secondary and accidental. They are only the means to the end and the end is the preservation of this nation.”

“It is absolutely necessary that this principle should be practically recognized; for that is the only way in which men can be saved from becoming the victims of a devitalized set of dogmas in a matter where dogmas are entirely out of place.” (P 16)

Think about this. A nation is not an Idea, but a living, breathing body of folk bound by land, language and ancestry.

“For the folk-community does not exist on the fictitious value of money but on the results of productive labor, which is what gives money its value.

This production, and not a bank or gold reserve, is the first cover for a currency. And if I increase production, I increase the real income of my fellow-citizens. And if I reduce production, I reduce that income, no matter what wages are paid out.” (P 23)

The higher the ratio of citizens who are incapable of productive labor, the poorer a nation will be.

The whole body of our German education, including the press, the theatre, the cinema and literature, is being controlled and shaped today by men and women of our own race. Some time ago one often heard it said that if Jewry were expelled from these institutions they would collapse or become deserted. And now what has happened? In all those branches cultural and artistic activities are flourishing. Our films are better than ever before and our theatrical productions today in our leading theatres stand supreme and alone in comparison with the rest of the world. Our press has become a powerful instrument to help our people in bringing their innate faculties to self-expression and assertion, and by so doing it strengthens the nation. German science is active and is producing results which will one day bear testimony to the creative and constructive will of this epoch. (P 26)

The Third Reich did indeed prove that Jews are not better than Gentiles at certain tasks, and that they are certainly not essential for competing internationally.

“Mr. Eden declares that under no circumstances does the British Government wish to see Europe torn into two halves.” […]

“It is to be regretted that the British Government did not adopt its present attitude at an earlier date, … for then the Treaty of Versailles would not have been entered into. This Treaty brought in the first division of Europe, namely a division of the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the latter nations being outlawed. Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people. That this division was wiped out, so far as concerns Germany, is essentially due to the National Socialist Revolution and this brings some credit to myself.” (P 34)

Hitler's first task was to undo the terrible and unfair damage of the Versailles Treaty which was forced upon the German people in 1919. He rightly takes credit for that accomplishment in the first years of his chancellorship, while also pointing out Britain's hypocrisy since it conducted a starvation naval blockade against Germany after the signing of the Armistice, and even continuing after the signing of the Versailles Treaty. Hundreds of thousands of German women, children and infants suffered needlessly and died.

"The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction. […] As far as Germany is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points:—

  1. We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration.

  2. We use every means in our power to keep this peril away from our people.

  3. And we are trying to make the German people immune to this peril as far as possible." (P 35)

Germany, because of its central location in Europe and its wealth and competence, was a particularly desirable target of the Bolsheviks.

"I should like to state that, complete German sovereignty and equality having now been restored, Germany will never sign a treaty which is in any way incompatible with her honour; with the honour of the nation and of the Government which represents it; or which otherwise is incompatible with Germany's vital interest and therefore in the long run cannot be kept.

I believe that this statement will be understood by all." (P 42)

Indeed, Hitler was not willing to sign a treaty of unconditional surrender in 1944-45 and no such treaty was ever signed by a German Government until the Two Plus Four Agreement was signed in 1990 by the West and East occupation governments.


race riots




The treacherous White Christian nations which sided with the Satanic Pharisees and Bolsheviks against a virile and racially conscious German Reich are now paying dearly for their shameful collaboration. They have been spiritually wrecked. And this cruse will continue to tax them in the foreseeable future unless they collectively repent for their grave sins.
Just look at the sorry state of the White race 80 years after the demise of the Fuhrer. Those who mocked or ignored his warnings, the spirit of that visionary returned and exacted a terrible price from the progeny of the 'Allies'. Irreligion, sexual deviance, drugs, blatant miscegenation, gluttony, womenfolk at the mercy of Jewish pimps and their gentile procurers, etc.
Adolf Hitler was the last self-respecting, nay the last greatest White Christian leader.
Whenever the White race repents and regains, and I am sure it will, the necessary confidence in its self and sheds the robes of self-flagellation and resignation, it will be obligated to cleanse the name of the Fuhrer of the muck smeared on it by intellectually dishonest toadies and ideological chameleons.
A verse from our Holy Scripture,
"O you mankind, surely We created you of a male and a female, and We have made you races and tribes that you may get mutually acquainted. Surely the most honorable among you in the Providence of Allah are the most pious; surely Allah is Ever-Knowing, Ever-Cognizant." (49:13)
By not recognizing nations and tribes, we deny the sacred order of nature. Adolf Hitler was aware of that, and, therefore, he upheld that divine order.

It's a speech which displays, as usual for Hitler's speeches, beauty, clarity and strength. 
I think Americans today are catching up with where the Germans were in 1937 - they are coming around to the notion that it's not a good idea to allow communists to roam free in your backyard. (As Hitler says in the speech, 'I consider Bolshevism the most malignant poison that can be given to a people'). After the re-election of Trump, Americans will see that communists can't be voted out either, and that will be in accord with Hitler's thinking.
So the long-term prognosis is good. But in the short term... I've followed your comments and Fox's at Unz.Org (comments and reactions at Unz can be filtered by commentator, see here), and you remind me of Brad Pitt as Achilles in the movie Troy (2004) as he wades, fearlessly, into hordes of Trojans and cuts them all down. But politics shouldn't be that hard. The comments at Unz give me the impression that National Socialism has all the world against it - Poles, Czechs, Americans, Jews, British, Russians... As King Theoden says in Lord of the Rings, 'What can men do against such reckless hate?'. During the war, Germany ran the entire Continent, with typical German fairness and efficiency, and regardless of what one thinks of that system, one has to admit that a European unity existed. Today I can't see that unity and system coming back - to judge by Unz. I always knew that Unz was full of Hitler-haters - see this article, in which not one person came to Germany's defence - but the responses to your articles shocked me.
Contrast that with 1937, when Germany was a strong and respected nation. In his speech, Hitler responds to Eden by asking, 'What are the grounds for the assumption that Germany wants to pursue a policy of Isolation?'. He then goes on to record that the new Germany has excellent relations with Poland, Austria, Italy, 'Hungary, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Greece, Portugal, Spain etc', it has no quarrel with France.
In Mein Kampf, Hitler warns National Socialists against viewing everyone as an enemy, but by 1945, everyone viewed National Socialism as an enemy. That continues into 2020.

Last night, I was taken aback when I heard Tucker Carlson say in a clip from his Fox show:

"Biden is probably not going to send you to an internment camp. In that way, he's the mirror image of Elizabeth Warren. Warren's eyes gleam with the menacing promise of Germanic efficiency."

Why that choice of words? But I shouldn't wonder because it's not the first time I've heard such anti-German, anti-Nazi speech from Tucker. For him, the "Nazis" are the stereotypical bad guys of history; he doesn't think to question it.

I don't read much on Unz, including Steve Sailer (although he's interesting). So I went through the comments on that article and didn't find hardly any familiar names. Lots of nonsense. Here's Sailer himself, making a comment that shows he's as ignorant as the rest of them:

"Right. Hitler’s Table Talk from during the war is full of expressions of extreme Slav hatred."

Full of? He's obviously only read excerpts from Table Talk. What does he call "hate?" Anything that is not a compliment? Hitler made observations about Russians and Poles (Slavs), none of which came from "hatred." All the WASPS at V-Dare are Hitler-bashers, even German-bashers - it's de rigueur at that site.

David, I am seriously wanting to establish some kind of fund for encouraging scholarly and positive research articles on "The Third Reich", which encompasses Hitler and "Hitlerism," National Socialism, German nationalism, but not so much Holocaust since that already has a dedicated support system. I'm going to contact some people about it that I think have the right perspective and are reliable. If you're interested to be involved in any way, hit the contact button and let me know.

It's a big taboo in Germany to criticize the "Euros", so bad as criticizing the Jews.
 Recently the Berlin police informed that the most prominent ethnicity engaging in organised crime is russian-speaking.
Then I remembered that funny observation by the great Rudyard Kipling:

"Let be clearly understood that the Russian is a delighful person till he tucks in his shirt. As an Oriental he is charming. It's only when he insists on being treated as the most easterly of western peoples instead of the most westerly of easterns that he becomes a racial anomaly extremely difficult to handle."


My greatest insight into the mind of Hitler comes from the 2 volume book.  I find it troubling that Irving is an expert of the subject of Hitler, yet Irving claimed he never read Mein Kampf because he didn't trust that it represented the real Adolf.
I only read it once finally a few years ago.  But I recall a young man with definite ideas about the world that didn't really waver in the later years.  His speeches are the same derivation of the basic theme.
He, even in the book, felt himself called and pre-ordained for a certain task.  He writes extensively on government order, politics, and social issues.
Finally, he viewed himself as the defender of a great ancient race of humans.  The core of the white European race.  He made many references to ancient Greco-Roman heroes.  The birth of Western Civilization.  
His political leanings were not the key to his mission.  I think when he stated in his spaech that he eliminated ALL of the parties, not just the Marxists, that he was back to his own fundamentals.  He really was just defending the white western civilization from dillusion and corruption.  It had nothing to do with politics or socialism.

Really good comment. I'm of the same mind - it was Hitler's Weltanschauung that is his greatest gift to the world. He became a politician because he needed a political party with which to reach the people - to be heard. He certainly was not a narcissist, or even a vain person. He only wanted to be effective and accomplish his "task" of freeing Germany from the vile influence of the Jews who are like blood-sucking vampires in every nation they inhabit.

I recommend the Thomas Dalton translation of Mein Kampf.

Irving claimed he never read Mein Kampf because he didn't trust that it represented the real Adolf.

I never knew that. That certainly lowers my opinion of Irving even further. He wanted to invent his own Adolf, whom he, Irving, was the sole proprietor of. Irving is the narcissist.

Add new comment