Thousands of African invaders picked up off Libya coast and brought to Europe

Published by carolyn on Fri, 2016-10-07 13:50

One out of 30 overcrowded vessels that left Libya on Tuesday whose inhabitants were picked up by European rescue ships and delivered to Italy, where they will remain. Does this make sense?

IF SUB-SAHARAN AND OTHER AFRICANS CAN MANAGE TO GET A LITTLE WAY OUT IN THE WATER off the coast of Libya, packed into a rubber dinghy, they can be picked up by European Navy ships that are patroling the Mediterranan Sea - and brought to Europe.

They never return to Africa. Even though the Africans invaders are still much closer to Libya when they are 'rescued', they are taken to migrant centers in Italy, where they sit indefinitely unless they escape into Europe, headed to Germany or the UK in search of the best welfare handouts.

And guess who is ultimately responsible for this - Hillary Clinton, who works in league with George Soros. She insisted on bringing down Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi when she was Secretary of State and turn Libya into a war zone.  She used our US armed forces to do this dirty work. Now she wants to bring down Syran leader Bashar Al-Assad to make it a permanent war zone, necessitating more migration.

According to The New Observer:

On Wednesday, October 5, European navy ships carried out more than 30 operations off the Libyan coast, taking at least 4,700 Africans off boats just a few miles from the North African coast.

The previous day, at least 6,000 Africans, packed into barely seaworthy rubber dinghies, were also picked up off the Libyan coast.

Does this sound like a plan? It's truly insane for indigenous Europeans to allow their land (and they have no other) to be destroyed by hordes of 70 IQ foreign races. It has to be because they don't get the truth and are lulled and bullied by their national media, in league with the 'one-world' philosopy of the European Union. This is why we need WWII revisionism! Please read the entire article here.


A few hours after I posted this, many private speeches of Hillary Clinton (for which she was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars each) were released to the public by Wikileaks.  One thing she said in a speech to Unibanco Itau, a Brazilian bank:

My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders. We have to resist protectionism [and] other kinds of barriers to market access and to trade.”

Carolyn, all of these comments appear to be directly on target regarding the sources of our peril, their assumption being that the internet can make billions of proles aware that something more must be done just now than cringe and complain, but without REAL regime change right here in the good ol' JuSA, civilization will relapse into barbarism for everyone. Nor does "Election 2016" offer any avenue out of this fever swamp whatsoever. For the Hasbara's 1/2 percent minority, which like the Mossad specializes in doing wars by deception, outvotes sites such as 100 to 1, the same way they did last century via their now-fading print mediacracy. With the money that's behind them, an internet search for "White pride" will continue returning 100 "white supremacism" and "racism" hits for every straight answer. So let's keep at what we're doing, but ALSO give more support to the mere handful of straight and honest hardcopy newspapers jumping into that void slowly being vacated by those no-longer-relevant metropolitan rags. One such highly-readable "Southern agrarian" monthly, a 24-page tabloid, would be The First Freedom out of Silverhill, Alabama. It's even online, for those too cheap to subscribe, at .

"If we broke up the big banks tomorrow, would that end racism? Would that end sexism?" Hillary Clinton told a crowd in Henderson, Nevada. What she meant was: "I am paid by the oligarchs to promote fear of racism and sexism so that the people will not break up the big banks".