Whites are the new victim class – let's act like it

Published by carolyn on Mon, 2017-09-18 01:55

From Hitler to Charlottesville - Girls at a Jungmädelschaft conduct a torch ceremony (1938). The HitlerJugend curriculum included studies about race ("Girls, Know Your Races!") and about the history of the swastika.

By Carolyn Yeager

I HAVEN'T POSTED ANYTHING HERE FOR 10 DAYS BECAUSE I've been hard at work helping to edit and proof galleys for a book I have coming out. Yes, that's right! The Barnes Review is publishing as a book the Ein Anderer Hitler articles that appeared in it's magazine from 2008 to 2011. This is the memoir of Hermann Giesler, architect and confidant of Adolf Hitler, which is available only in German. The English translation of selected chapters done by Wilhelm L. Kriessmann and me (Carolyn Yeager) is still the only one in existence, as far as I can discover.

When put all together, as I'm seeing in the galley proofs, the impact of Giesler's vision of the time in question (as he received it from extensive personal contact with the Fuehrer) becomes far more clear and more powerful to me, as I'm sure it will to careful readers. So I am newly inspired by thoughts and ideas that I want to begin to express in this article.

Most people have no idea of how many firsts and exclusives have been accomplished by yours truly because I offer it all up on this personal web site, carolynyeager.net, for free. Nor do they realize how much is stolen by Internet bloggers who publish it on their own blogs without acknowledgment or even a link back to its source. Just the latest example is César Tort, who published on July 5, 2017 the whole of my copyrighted translation of Hitler's 1920 speech “Why We are Antisemites” without giving this site credit or asking permission, as requested at the end of the posted speech. Tort is a Hitler enthusiast who uses the German Fuehrer as a model for his own macho brand of male “traditionalist” views.

Adolf Hitler was not a “traditionalist” as more than just Tort have tried to make him out to be. He was instead modern and future-oriented. The party he founded, as we know, was intent on preserving German history, and the national and racial values that bound the Folk together. Germany at that time had been terribly abused by the Allies of WWI and by World Jewry, including being invaded by Jews from the East, mainly Poland, seeking to take advantage of Germany's weakened state. In order to build itself back, Germans had to assert their pride and nationalist goals strongly once again. This was the work Hitler gave to the NSDAP under his direction.

The population had shrunk, from both the huge losses on the battlefields of the 'Great War' and because of the plummeting birth rate due to economic collapse and the resulting takeover of much of the German professional sphere by Jews. Private property of bankrupt Germans was “bought for pennies on the dollar” by avaricious Jewish 'businessmen'. The remedy: along with Hitler's economic and social policies there was no choice but that German women bring the birthrate back up. Of course, German men were exhorted to marry and be faithful, breadwinner husbands and fathers. It worked! The German birthrate turned upward. The German economy and German pride revived. A new and positive mood was felt in the country.

Adolf Hitler and his National Socialist comrades were fully aware of the character of Jews vs. the character of Germans. They knew that the idealism and sense of fairness in the German character often resulted in great naïveté and a lack of protective “armor” when dealing with foreigners. They believed that for Germans to thrive they had to be protected from some foreigners, but especially from Jews. They believed that Germans could not succeed when at the mercy of crafty, sly and often crypto Jews whose moral code was of a distinctly different, Oriental origin.

In short, their consensus was that Germans and Jews did not mix; when they did it was to the disadvantage of the German. Therefore, the idea formed that for a renaissance of Germany to take place, Jews must not be allowed to hold influential positions in key sectors, which meant neither should they be citizens. When Hitler took power, he began the changes that would eventually rid the country of its Jewish inhabitants.

Who's being immoral to whom?

We're taught, of course, because we live in countries dominated and controlled by Jewish power players that this very idea was the beginning of the greatest criminal undertaking in history—the persecution and genocide of Europe's Jews. It is therefore said to be an immoral idea. Forgotten, or swept under the rug, is the immorality of what the Jews were doing to Germans, and in Germany. Oh wait—it's not just swept under the rug but the expression of such ideas as Jewish immorality are legally proscribed in Germany today … thanks to the special influence Jews have gained from the successful elevation of their tribe to the level of greatest victims in world history.

Without a doubt, we are living in our own Weimar Germany and need our own Adolf Hitler to save us from it. Yet all we have to do is what he did—teach the people the nature of the Jew. And teach them, too, the power of their vote to remove Jewish domination and control from their lives. Unfortunately, too many westerners have come to like and respect Jews more than their own folk. They have been successfully indoctrinated by these immoral liars. We have become internationalized.

As with Germans, European folk are not able to hold their own against the cunning tactics of the Jew. This has been shown; the evidence is in. Whites need to be protected from Jews in their own national homelands (including the USA) by a leadership that understands this. Instead of saying we are better than everyone else because we are paying everyone's bills … we should admit our weaknesses (such as too much altruism and sense of fairness directed outward) and establish barriers and protections for our well-being. When our politicians say "This isn't who we are", say "Yes it is!" or "It is now!"

In the USA, our new President Trump is attempting to do this, but he also naturally feels responsible to represent all of the citizenry in what is now unfortunately a multi-racial nation. (This last is thanks to the Jews, of course.) President Trump also has a blind spot when it comes to the Jews, to Israel, and the “crime” of antisemitism they invented. But that is something he shares with our entire Congress, whose blind spot is in most cases bigger than his.

So what to do? Dump him and look for someone else?

No, because in spite of his flaws, Donald Trump sincerely loves White people and this makes him stand out from all those who DO NOT. He's also in the same White man's position with the Jews as we are – they play him and trap him into seeing them as friends. But one thing Donald Trump never did was marry a Jew (in three marriages) and conceive Jewish children. His daughter did, the daughter he dotes on, which is a tragic twist on the situation. Still, I believe Trump wants to help White Americans just as Hitler wanted to help Germans.

I continue to believe we need to recognize this and help him, ie. push him and speak out loudly when he veers off in a wrong direction. At bottom he is our friend, but is struggling with powerful forces in the White House, in Washington D.C. and in the media. However, we cannot leave it up to him. We must be far more adamant than we have been. We must INSIST, and noisily so as do our enemies, that our interests be served.

Whites now need to be the protected class

There is no room for “friendly Jews” or ever seeing any other group (such as Negroes, Mestizos or Muslims) as more dangerous to us than Jews. An alliance with Jews can never work in our favor. We especially have to reject the effort to criminalize “Anti-Semitism” with all our might. This is the most direct threat to our freedom … and in our own land! Jews should be no different than any other minority group. Back in June, I began promoting the theme “Stop Special Treatment for Jews” as a way to draw attention to the core of this problem. I didn't expect anyone else to pick it up and no one did. Now I want to go a little further with “Whites Need Protection from Jewish Replacement Strategies.” That doesn't have much of a ring to it (hopefully it can be improved on, like “Protect Whites from Jewish Genocide”) but that is the full idea, which should not be watered down in any way. We must depict ourselves as the victim! We are the victim! Germans did not depict themselves as victims after they were crushed in WWII—it was never in their character to do so, and also they were not allowed to. But they should have!

It's time we got off the theme of “the superior race” and looked at our situation with clear eyes. It's time we took more drastic measures. It's time we realize the alt-right academics that have been mainstays in the White Nationalist movement for so long, are not doing us any good any longer. It's time to stop reading each new essay they produce on their web sites and instead write emails to the White House, your congressman and senators and let them have your full fury! Politely, of course. And keep it up, even as we attend to our own efforts and alliances. We need to make a lot of noise, and demand accountability from all authorities. We also need to stop making “the unity of all Whites” so important because there is no such thing. In that regard, we need to stop denigrating Hitler and National Socialism because of Poland! Let's face it, if Adolf Hitler didn't carry out a planned extermination of 6 million Jews (or anything close to it), he is not responsible for any war crimes worse than those his enemies carried out. War crimes abounded during WWII, on all sides, including by Poles. It's all bullshit.

We need to take back our country … nothing less. Donald Trump can help us, but the onus is on us and it's time we recognized it. We could start with putting up a much better campaign against the Charlottesville slander. I am very surprised that it's been so weak, practically non-existent. Where are the lawsuits against the police and the mayor's office? Where are the powerful essays denouncing the establishment's lies? Where is Richard Spencer? He took off for France and hasn't been seen or heard from since (as far as I know).

Kudos to Occidental Dissent for hunting down the videos revealing Heather Heyer images at the protest and the fact she died of a heart attack, and to the videomakers who examined the uncanny resemblance between Susan Bro and Donna Soto. But where is the follow-up? Honest to God, our “leaders” are depending on Tucker Carlson of Fox News to do the work for them! But Fox will only go so far (not very). Our “academics” are afraid to go anywhere, as usual, that they fear they might be ridiculed for later.

There's a gold mine of opportunity here. Our people with the technical computer skills should be on it. Are they? Many would rather sit back and trash Trump, it seems, than do any real work themselves.

Recommended video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZTSjm8X5GM


Okay, here's a good beginning attempt to unwind the Charlottesville narrative by seasoned revisionist Nicholas Kollerstrom. Unfortunately, host Jim Fetzer took up too much time with his repetitive rants in his loud, raucous voice. But the good part is that it's a video with images to study as they talk.

One thing I really appreciated is a close-up through the front windshield of the gray Challenger revealed a driver who was definitely NOT James Fields. It's on the screen from 34:44 til 35m so you can get a good look.


It seems only "conspiracy" investigators are willing or able to dig into these events. Your typical cautious White Nationalists are afraid to take a chance. Thanks to Dana for alerting me to this video.

I don't know.  I kind of like the opposing styles of the two.  Nick Kollerstrom is great, but sometimes it's hard to understand him because (a) he has an accent, and (b) he's kind of quiet.  Jim Fetzer represents the boisterous Captain Kirk to Kollerstrom's logical Mr. Spock.

In this case I think Nick is quite understandable, and also he has a plan he wants to present which he seems concerned he won't be able to finish because Fetzer goes off on his own tangents. Fetzer spent a lot of time on his letter to the U of Virginia, didn't he. and Fetzer controls the images. LOL. Yes, they make an interesting pair. All in all, I appreciate the video, which Fetzer provides.

Carolyn, if HH really died, of a heart attack, or any other cause, in Charlottesville that day, why would they have had to come up with a crisis actor mother for her? Didn't she have a mother - or if she didn't, couldn't they have just said so?
And would they really go to the trouble of staging a car attack without being ready to provide an alleged murder victim? Wouldn't that have been the point?
At any rate, if the mothers do turn out to be the same, it would mean that Sandy Hook too was a fake, with all the implications, which I guess would mean lots of pretend deaths.

AFAIK Susan Bro is the source of the story that her daughter died of a heart attack in the street of Charlottesville at the scene of the crash. NBC News carried the story.  http://dailyheathen.net/2017/09/05/confirmed-heather-heyer-died-heart-attack/  and https://www.nbcnews.com/video/heather-heyer-s-mom-delivers-message-about-karma-to-white-nationalists-1028340803735 (People who do that sort of thing need to make copies of it b/c it seems to be the only place saying this on the entire Internet.)

There has been no denial of it. But the media still blame Heyer's death on the crash (supposedly her leg was injured) and never mentions the heart attack.No one. Not anywhere.

I only pursue the idea the mothers are the same because they look so much alike. How likely is it that two mothers of victims of major suspect "anti-White" events 5 years apart would be so similar? Not very likely. That's why I say, Bring the two women together to prove they are not the same person. They may not be.

I don't get involved with trying to figure out all their reasoning and who exactly was behind it. But I can't believe it's as they say until they establish this fact. This is basic, and yes, the implications are vast ... just like with the holohoax.

Exactly - the alleged Susan Bro is the source for her alleged daughter, the alleged Heather Heyer, having died of a heart attack. If it turns out that Susan Bro is also Donna Soto, as she certainly appears to be, then I would say her credibility is all shot to hell, so there is no reason to believe HH died at all, by a heart attack or any other way, on Susan Bro's say-so.
I think the two theses are probably mutually exclusive: that "Susan Bro" is "Donna Soto" and that "Heather Heyer" died of anything at all. I would suggest that the "heart attack" story is limited hangout, since so many people are studying the videos and noticing that HH was not hit by a car. As I wrote elsewhere, whether HH died of a heart attack or a direct hit is not very important to the message that a murderous White Supremacist drove into a crowd of people and someone ended up dead.
But I haven't seen any reason to believe anyone ended up dead, except that we are told someone did - just as we are told that the woman trotted out to eulogize the alleged Heather Heyer is her mother, a woman named Susan Bro.

Well, there's a picture of the alleged Heather Heyer being carted off on a stretcher at the Daily Heathen site. Very fat, dressed in black. In the 4th video down, at the 7:10 mark, this woman is being resusitated by medics and they are saying "Come on, lady." So there's evidence this story is true. I am not doubting everything.

Once again, to put the "identical  twin" story to rest, I just want to see them together. I will not venture out further than that. Except for the image of the driver through the front windshield -- who wasn't James Fields, that is.

Well, just because she was being carted off on a stretcher doesn't mean she was dead - nor does the medics saying "Come on lady". If it was a fake death, then they obviously would have faked it. Just as the man in the wheelchair being wheeled down the street in Boston didn't mean he had just had his leg blown off - just that (((they))) wanted a sufficient portion of the population to believe he had.
Unlike you, I AM doubting pretty much everything the media has told us about the alleged car attack - I see no reason not to. I'm certainly not saying 100% HH didn't die, and obviously I could be wrong about everything - but if they had a real death, why would they need a fake mother? 
And since my hypothesis is that, if the car attack was fake the purpose was to provide a "dead body" to pin on "White supremacists", then they certainly wouldn't leave that to chance, but would stage that as well (unless they actually killed her, of course - but I sort of doubt that). 

... then you're buying into, promoting, advocating ALL the various hatreds imputed to him and his programs. 
That's how it works, now - you've got to AFFIRMATIVELY demonstrate compliance with the dominant groupthink of today. If you somehow fail to do so ... well, you know who you are.
Don't you?

Excellent article, as usual. Also, as usual the point of what Germany's citizens did to rid Germany of the Jew infestation of 1919 to 1933 is completely ignored and incorrectly accredited to one person, Hitler. Hitler did nothing by himself. Citizens of Germany elected a "government" of Germany in 1933 that enacted "laws" to resolve the Jew infestation of Germany.  And that is exactly what citizens of America must do, elect a "Congress" (no one person in America has the power to do it) to enact laws, just laws, then enforce those just laws.
U.S. citizens have the power to not reelect (replace corrupt Lawmakers) 33 Senators (Lawmakers) of the Senate and 435 Representatives (Lawmakers) of the House, in Congress every two years.
A U.S. President is NOT a Lawmaker, is not authorized nor empowered to legislate, and citizens vote does not elect the President.

Thanks Allan, and I do include Congress (in my mind) when I mention the power of our vote. But we know that voters check the same boxes election after election. The incumbent wins! What's up with that? Sometimes one has no good choice to make, s/he is okay on some things, bad on others. My Congressman Lamarr Smith is good on immigration (he's even introduced a RAISE-type bill in the House), but will cater to Israel like all the rest, so I will keep voting for him. He has a VERY safe seat. I do send him emails though, and let him know what I think about Jewish special privileges. My Senator Ted Cruz is up for re-election in 2018 and he's an extreme ass-licker for Israel. If there would be someone decent opposing him in the primary, I would vote for that person, but probably there will not be.

This Sunday Germans will elect Angela Merkel to an unprecedented 4th term ... after she has brought about destructive conditions in their country that none but the most ardent communists and German-haters like. They let her convince them that she had no choice if Germany is to be a "moral" country. Voters often feel between a rock and a hard place.

Good insights.  After reading Benton Bradberry's book The Myth of German Villainy I see how Judaism is no longer a religion so much as a political entity.  All Jews belong to this fabricated idealized Nation of Israel, simply by not protesting against it if nothing else.   And God has nothing to do with it save as a way to manipulate the world into believing it has some sort of moral heritage that must be protected.  As Bradberry points out the Ashkenazi Jews, which is more than 90% of all Jews, have nothing to do with and have no links to ancient Palestine.   If the world ever wakes up to what really happened in the war started by these murderers, both the rape of Russian and of Germany, the power of the Jews will quickly be curtailed.   Since the numbers game is winding down the Jewish state must act quickly to make 'anti-semiticism' against the law in this country as it now is in 17 other countries.  My objection is that the use of anti-semiticism to describe any questioning of history is itself a falacy.  I am not anti-semitic when I want the truth.  Besides which, most of the Arab world that is under attack by the Jewish nation is really of the real semitic races.  It is rather the truth that makes me against Jewish crimes against humanity.  There are many Jews who will renounce what is being done in their name, I hope.  There were many Jews who faught for the National Socialists, 150,000, against the Jewish Communists and their hoards.      The truth will make you free.   

Some remarks :
1) A way out for Whites in the US would be to demand that Jews be recognized as  a separate ethnic group and then insist on proportional representation, which is only 2%. That would mean a huge reduction of Jews in banking, politics, education and media, exactly those areas they use for their destructive control. Jews would then protest that they are not a "race" but only a religious minority. True, Jews are not a race, but they are an ethnic group, whether they believe in their religion or not. The ethnic identity of Jews is more outspokwen than that of "Hispanics" which can mean persons of any race (even white or black) if only from Latin America and Hispanic is an official category in American politics.
2)  Susan Bro of Charlottesville = Donna Soto of Sandy Hook is very convincing. It is not the first time that the same crisis actor is used in different hoaxes.
3) I would be interested to know what your comment was on Tom Sunic's artice on race in NS Germany that was rejected by the moderator of TOO.

I'm very willing to tell you. Fortunately I copied it for myself. I wrote:

Carolyn Yeager

September 18, 2017 - 12:22 pm | Permalink

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

“The main intent of this essay, however, is not to glorify National-Socialism or ABSOLVE IT FROM SOME OF ITS CRIMES, but to indirectly point out that in the so-called free liberal democracy there are subjects that are carefully being avoided by humanities professors and studiously shunned by politicians of all colors.”

Professors like you and Kevin MacDonald, Tom?
My main question, though, is what crimes of National Socialism are you referring to? If you accuse NS of crimes in both Part 1 and 2, you should be able to say what they are and debate the question with those who disagree with you. This will tell us who is avoiding and shunning.
Thanks very much. I enjoy your translations.


Truthfully I didn't think they would publish it -- too cowardly. If I got something of that nature from a commenter, telling me that I was being hypocritical, I would publish it (unless it was dirty Jew trolling) ... and answer it. I have done so. But they can't admit theiy are hypocrites. I am really disgusted that Sunic will call out "humanities professors" and politicians, but cannot/will not recognize/admit that he does the same thing. And so does Kevin.

I invite readers here to give their take on this if they so wish.

Great comment, Carolyn. Ingrid Rimland calls this kind of hat tip to unspecified "crimes" of Hitler or the NS Regime, the "obligatory knee-fall" (obligatorische Knie-fall). Of course, when a book is to be published by a Jewish-led publishing house it's one thing - but is there really such a strict code at TOO (yes, of course there is)? Or does Tom Sunic really believe Hitler's regime was criminal?
Another version of the "obligatory knee-fall" that has been especially plentiful since Charlottesville is, when someone calls for freedom for right-of-center speakers to express their views, they seem to be required to add "no matter how repellent" (loathesome, distasteful, repulsive, reprehensible, offensive, abhorrent, etc.).

For the redaction of TOO the Holocaust, NS in general (and "conspiracy theories" about 9/11) are "third rail". That is their policy and that can be respected, but on the other hand they should refrain from making facile statements on these subsects (taken from the "mainstream consensus') without any debate.

Put in more simple language, TOO's fear of going against the grain of the academic consensus is understandable, in your opinion, but they should not make statements they are not willing to debate on the merits.

Thank you, I agree. Therefore, dishonest. That's the word for it. And trapped in political correctness. And that is all I'm ever saying about MacDonald, Sunic and TOO.

Donald Trump's mentor, Roy Cohen, was a very aggressive and shadey Jewish lawyer involved in "Brownstone" operations (pedophilic blackmail). Cohen taught Trump how to swim in the shark infested waters of New York real estate and politics. Trump's favorite child Ivanka is a convert not just to to Judaism, but to her princeling husband's criminal Chabad Lubavitsch sect. I believe at least one, if not both, of his sons are also married to Jewesses who are providing him with Jewish grandchildren. Trump being who is - a lifetime media darling who bounced back and forth between New York City, Hollywood and Palm Beach Florida's playground for the rich like an orange tennis ball until he landed in the White House (which his artificial looking Slovenian trophy wife refuses to live in) - certainly must know who was behind 911 and dozens of other psychological warfare, false flag and entrapment operations perpetrated on the dull, petulant, obese citizens of this country by it's hostile elite yet he's never exposed any of it. He folded like a cheap suit over the "birther" issue, prosecuting Hillary Clinton, Syria, DACA, The Wall, bringing industry and jobs back, and statements on the engineered Charlottesville and Parsons Green events. Today he's at UN threatening the communist bedroom community of North Korea! Expect more nothing for America from it's game show host president except the erosion of everything that made the country the envy of the rest of the world for over a century.   

Charles, You're real good at passing around stuff like this, but what do you ever do about it?

The "false flag" at Charlottesville -- if that's what it was -- needs to be fully investigated by the White community who are the victims of it. At the very least, if Susan Bro is not the mother of Heather Heyer, that exposes the media participation in a major fake story and destroys their credibility. Where is this so-called Alt-Right Movement on this? They seem unwilling to touch it. Something is very, very wrong here.

Congratulations on an excellent and timely article. The positivity in it was as refreshing as a Summer shower. The direction you've signposted is one white nationalists all round the world should be taking notice of. After all, seeing whites as the new victim class - in their own lands, I might add - is no exaggeraton given we are no longer allowed our own living space. We are the victims of an ongoing genocide no less. Here, for example, in Sydney, Australia's biggest city, strolling around the city centre gives one the impression we have already been replaced.
Kind regards,
John Moffat

This is a real red pill article. The idea that Whites are the real victims is a very good way to get average Whites to start defending themselves. Without this understanding, all the stats about affirmative action and interracial crime can be dismissed with "well Whites have White Privilege, and need to repent".  Excelent article Carolyn!

Thank you, both John and JoeG. One does need to hear that sometimes. And we do need to fight.