Dec. 17, 2012

Prof. Kevin MacDonald assesses the situation for White Advocacy as 2012 comes to a close. After the wake-up call of the national election, now there is the shock of the 20 children murdered in their kindergarten classroom in Connecticut.  Discussion included:

• The good news is a crop of new writers and Internet sites that focus on White people’s issues;
• The bad news is we can’t get onto mainstream TV, even for an interview;
• Very strong anti-communist America First movement in the 30′s and 40′s was ended in an instant by Pearl Harbor, essentially a false-flag event;
• Strategies to use when The Second Amendment is seriously challenged in 2013 in the wake of the Connecticut shootings;
• The dismal state of psychiatry  today, and the overuse of poorly understood drugs;
• Blame for most of what’s gone wrong can be placed on the liberal revolution that began in the 1960′s.

Problems with the call-in system plus human error caused some delay at the beginning of the 2nd hour.

In the first hour, Carolyn attempts to put some finality to her researches into the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion by showing that the origin and authorship still cannot be known for certain. Thus their value lies in their ability to reveal changes in Western nations that result from wars and revolutions, just as they have occurred, and how they were carried out and by whom. If this is not good enough for some people, then they will see the Protocols as having no, or too little, value. Carolyn still rates this document as having, on balance, an important contribution to make.

By Carolyn Yeager, Dec. 16, 2012

Part 2 of "The Continuing False Statements of Jim Condit, Jr."

Condit references "Hennecke Kardel" and Dietrich Bronder's books as his proof that Adolf Hitler and his top associates were all Jews. No matter how many people tell Condit he is full of it, he won't listen and continues to insist on "his sources." He says that I, Carolyn Yeager, "NEVER ONCE gave a reason why a source of his was illegitimate." Here, I offer more correct information on 'Who is Jewish' and I'd like to see Condit prove any of it wrong.

From the Introduction to Adolf Hitler—The Founder of Israel by "Hennecke Kardel":

The reader might look unsuccessfully for a book which long ago disappeared from the market. It was an extraordinary and instructive investigation conducted by a German Jew, [there are no German Jews, only Jews who live in Germany] Dietrich Bronder, a high school teacher. Its title is: Before Hitler Came. It was printed in 1964 and is about who was who in the Hitler's apparatus: "Of Jewish descent, or being related to Jewish families were: the Leader and Reichschancelor Adolf Hitler; his representatives the Reichsminister Rudolf Hess; the Reichsmarshall Hermann Goering; the Reichsleader of the NSDAP Gregor Stressed (sic - should be Strasser), Dr. Josef Goebbels, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Heinrich Himmler; the Reichsminister von Ribbentrop (who pledged close friendship with the famous Zionist Chaim Weizmann, the first head of the State of Israel who died in 1952); von Keudell; field commanders Globocnik (the Jewish destructor); Jordan and Wilhelm Hube (sic); the great SS-Leaders Reinhard Heydrich, Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski and von Keudell II, who also were active in the destruction of Jews. Next came Hitler's bankers and before 1933 supporters: Ritter von Stauss (Vice-president of the NS-Parliament); von Stein; the General Field Marshall and Secretary of State Milch; the Under-Secretary of State Gauss; the physicist and old Vice-president of the NS-Parliament Party members Philipp von Lenhard and Abraham Esau; the very old party-member Hanffstaengel (sic) NSDAP's newspaper Chief of Foreign Department (later on an advisor to President D.E. (sic) Roosevelt) as well as professor Haushofer."

Is any of this true? My own research revealed the following:

By Carolyn Yeager, Dec. 16, 2012

Ken Hoop has sent me an exchange of 5 emails between himself and Jim Condit, Jr. (pictured right), under the subject line: RE: Yeager

I have never met Ken but I thank him for giving me the opportunity to refute once again Condit's childish repetition (maybe stemming from his characteristic blindness) that, when debating with him and about him, I "NEVER ONCE gave a reason why a source (of his) was illegitimate." Here is part of the email exchange:

From: Ken Hoop
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:07 PM
To: jconditjr
Subject: Yeager

Of course when you quote kook sources to substantiate kook positions, Yeager and Irving and Duke and Rudolf and Weber and Faurisson and Butz are going to call you on it.
 
But then you would have to go back to about when you were 25 and begin to sort out all the kook sources you have adopted as true
on all your kook projects on everything from the Siri kookism on..

From: jconditjr
To: bronson
Subject: RE: Yeager
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:27:42 -0500

The facts I cite are IN THE PUBLIC RECORD in general --- they are in the MAINSTREAM SOURCES -- but they are either given little or no commentary -- or ABSURD commentary, once you look closely.

 Yeager NEVER ONCE gave a reason why a source was illegitimate.

---

The truth of the matter is that I spent most of the time alloted to me doing just what he says I didn't do, both on the Deanna Spingola show "debate" between Jim and me (unavailable) and on the Charles Guiliani show wherein I pointed out why Jim's sources were faulty. It is not my fault that Condit simply ignores what I say to him and does not respond to it. For example:

Dec. 13, 2012

Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott read and comment on Chapter 20, Jewish Testimony in Favor of Bolshevism.

“The Jew believes the world is his by right” and has found that revolution is the speediest way to gain it.  The revolutionaries criticize the Gentile capitalists, but not the Jewish capitalists; in fact, this chapter proclaims “the Bolshevik revolution was a carefully groomed investment on the part of International Jewish Finance.”

Quoting from The Jewish Chronicle (London), writer Israel Zangwill, Rabbi J.L. Magnes, Bernard Lazare, and a Mr. Cohan writing in the newspaper Communist, their proud support for the “Jewish Revolutionary Spirit” is shown.

Finally, what Jewish capitalism has gained from Bolshevism: 1) A whole rich country (Russia), without the cost of war. 2) Demonstrated the necessity of gold; the fiction that gold is wealth. 3) Demonstrated its power to the world, i.e. making Europe afraid. 4) Valuable practice in the art of revolution … coming next to the United States.

Image: Political cartoon from 1911 St. Louis Post-Dispatch showing Karl Marx receiving a big welcome on Wall St. from Gentile financiers Rockefeller, Morgan and Flynn, plus Teddy Roosevelt. Another instance of Gentile capitalists being blamed instead of Jewish ones.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of  The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Dec. 10, 2012

What is called The Damascus Affair was the disappearance and suspected murder in 1840 of a Christian Priest, said to have been killed while in the Jewish Quarter for his blood to be used in the approaching Passover celebration. The accused men were declared innocent after a delegation of high-level European Jews, headed by Sir Moses Montefiore, traveled to the capital of the Ottoman Empire  to negotiate with the Pasha.  Following this major “blood libel” event, international-minded Jews considered how to organize for the protection of the Jewish reputation world-wide. One result was the Alliance Israelite Universelle, founded in 1860 by Adolphe Cremieux who was also a member of the above-mentioned delegation. This new sense of, and felt-need for, solidarity gave rise to the modern Jewish Press, a mass of new institutions and organizations all aimed at serving the “Jewish community,” and the emergence of a written plan, a version of which we know as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

Image: Symbol of the Alliance Israelite Universelle on door of “Mikveh Israel’ school. The hands clasping indicate the “helping hand” that Jews should offer to one another, no matter where they are. Enlarge

Dec. 6, 2012

Hadding Scott and Carolyn Yeager read and comment on Chapter 19, The All-Jewish Mark on “Red Russia.”

What Jews deny to Gentiles, they often admit among themselves. Their most persistent denials have been about the Jewishness of Bolshevism.  This chapter points out that both of Kerensky’s parents were Jewish and that Lenin (pictured right) may have been Jewish — his children spoke Yiddish fluently and Lenin abolished the Christian Sunday and established by law the Jewish Saturday Sabbath. [Wikipedia says Lenin's mother was born of a Jewish father, making him 1/4 Jew.]

The rest of the Bolshevik councils and commissariats were overwhelmingly Jewish, from 100% to a low of 76%.  Statements by prominent Americans of 1918-19 are quoted and discussed. Where  Bolshevism reigned, Jews were treated differently than the national people, including in how their children were educated. The Jewish narrative eventually changed to glorification of Jewish leadership in all revolutions, portraying Jews as providing the necessary element of discontent, leading to “improvement and progress.”

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

by Carolyn Yeager, Dec. 4, 2012

My latest phone call on the morning of Monday Dec. 3 to the Associated Press office in New York brought the following results:  The answerer, upon hearing my name, immediately connected me to Corporate Communications, where I spoke to the same woman I spoke with the previous Monday, Nov. 26. I identified myself and told her I had re-sent the first email from Nov. 8 (rather than the second one from Nov. 14) as she requested but did not receive any acknowledgment of receipt from anyone. She said she  forwarded it to the proper parties, but had not guaranteed there would be a reply.

In answer to my persistent questions, to which she finally gave her name as “Lauren,” though she would not give me a last name, she added the information that the email was forwarded to “the journalist and the news editor.” Lauren would not reveal the name of the news editor. Thus the road forward on this issue is being “stonewalled” by the guilty. As we know, they are able to write and publish tons of prose about the impossible stories of the “survivors” of the “Holocaust,” but go deaf, dumb and blind when it comes to answering simple questions of fact concerning these stories. Let’s take a look at what they are actually guilty of.

Stonewalling: To refuse to answer or cooperate (esp. in supplying information).

I have asked for further elucidation from reporter Verena Dobnik about her vaguely-worded but pointed reference to seeing a “death camp” tattoo on the left arm of Elie Wiesel during an interview session …  that has never been seen by anyone! Yet, not a single further word has come forth from her.

What is the Associated Press

[From Wikipedia] The Associated Press is an American news agency, a cooperative owned by its contributing newspapers, radio and television stations in the United States, which both contribute stories to the AP and use material written by its staff journalists. Many newspapers and broadcasters outside the United States are AP subscribers, paying a fee to use AP material without being contributing members of the cooperative. The AP staff is represented by the Newspaper Guild union, which operates under the Communication Workers union, which operates under the AFL-CIO. The content of AP news stories relating to current political issues that impact union interests has increasingly been subject to claims of news media bias.  

Journalism Scandals

Journalistic scandals include: plagiarism, fabrication, and omission of information; activities that violate the law, or violate ethical rules; the altering or staging of an event being documented; or making substantial reporting or researching errors with the results leading to libelous or defamatory statements.  Please continue reading at Elie Wiesel Cons The World

Dec. 3, 2012

Where are we going? … is the overall theme discussed by Tanstaafl and Carolyn — not only in relation to The White Network, but to the entire White Advocacy or White Nationalist movement. The two see themselves as unique in Internet radio in the sense of being totally intolerant of any Jewish or other non-white presence, and see no need to change that.  After a slightly delayed beginning of one full minute (sorry about that),  some areas of discussion were:

• “Race Matters” is the subject of Tan’s  shows on tWn and also the lesson taken from the recent Presidential elections;
• Carolyn wants to explore ways to go on the offensive using Jewish tactics to expose Jewish tactics;
• How serious are the divisions that exist between pro-white peoples — are we exacerbating them unnecessarily;
• The pros and cons of selling advertising and seeking for larger audiences;
• The White Network experience with hosting other programs and why it is difficult;
• What is effective vs what is entertaining and just fills people’s listening needs;
• Call from Don about the decline in TV watching.

In the end we conclude we want to satisfy ourselves, making that our standard. We hope by satisfying ourselves we can satisfy our listeners too.

Image reads "Where are we going?"

By Carolyn Yeager

Above, Tom Hanks and his wife Rita Wilson with Wiesel at the Elie Wiesel Foundation 'Arts for Humanity' Gala in New York City.

On Oct. 17 in New York, actor Tom Hanks became this year’s honoree of the Elie Wiesel  Foundation for Humanity. Honored for what, you ask? Well, it’s a little vague. What is written in the news account is “Hanks’ consistent thoughtfulness and concern with his charitable endeavors.” Doesn’t specify what they are, but I looked it up separately and found Hanks is a supporter of a variety of mainly health, i.e. curing disease symptoms, and environmental causes. He is on the Board of Governers of the National Space Society, which is dedicated to the creation of a spacefaring civilization, and he supports UNICEF.

Oprah Winfrey was similarly honored in 2007. That ceremony was held at the Waldorf-Astoria in New York City.  The ceremony for Tom Hanks took place at the New York Public Library, the difference of location possibly having to do with pre-Madoff and post-Madoff.

However, Hanks’ award is called the Arts for Humanity award, rather than the Humanitarian Award, which doesn’t appear to be given out every year – the last one mentioned was given to  Nicholas Sarkozy in 2008 when he was President of France, for his “steadfast support of Israel.” So is Hanks’ award the same or different from the Humanitarian Award? As with everything to do with Wiesel, it can’t be pinned down.

But the question that came up in my one-track mind is: Did Elie pull back his tuxedo jacket sleeve and show the famous actor his vaunted “death camp” tattoo – as a special privilege that he reserves for certain people? Hanks didn’t mention it, so I guess not. There were probably too many people around, anyway. This tattoo-unveiling must take place when no witnesses are present to spoil what is one person’s word against everyone who was not there (i.e. everyone else)!

Only Verena Dobnik, the Associated Press reporter on the NY City beat, has made the claim of seeing the elusive symbol that represents Elie being an inmate at the Auschwitz “Death Camp.”  Please continue reading at Elie Wiesel Cons The World.