"The International Jew" Study Hour - Episode 62

Published by carolyn on Thu, 2013-08-29 16:19
 
00:00

August 29, 2013

Hadding Scott and Carolyn Yeager read and comment on Chapter 57, “Jewish Idea in American Monetary Affairs.”

The great Jewish banking houses of the U.S. in 1921 were foreign importations led by four men – Belmont, Schiff, Warburg and Kahn – all “German” Jews. The focus of the chapter is on Paul Moritz Warburg (right) whose banker brothers Max and Felix remained in Hamburg. Among the highlights:

  • Interesting story about doubt cast on the citizenship of Otto Herman Kahn;
  • Warburg’s testimony before the Committee on Banking and Currency of the U.S. Senate in executive session is dramatized here;
  • Warburg studied banking all over the world, including Asia, before settling down in Hamburg; then came to the U.S. to stay  in 1902;
  • In 1906, he became active in promoting the monetary “reforms” that he thought were necessary, and was a consultant for Sen. Nelson Aldrich of the Monetary Commission;
  • The highly secret meeting at Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia in 1910 between Aldrich, Warburg, Asst. Sec. of the Treasury Andrew and 4 other financiers is described.

Image:  Paul M. Warburg, conceded to be the actual author of our central bank plan, the Federal Reserve System, by knowledgeable authorities. Member of the original Board of Governors, 1914-1918; president Federal Advisory Council, 1918-1928. 

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Comments

7 Responses

  1. Steven

    August 30, 2013 at 6:29 pm

    To really understand the conflict between Russia and Jews and Freemasons watch the following video.

    (Full) In the Shadow of Hermes by Jüri Lina (2011)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIuW-vNQsQI

    As for the money problem a system of metallic money minted by the state is the solution. Every other form of money is a device of the jews created to enslave and bankrupt the people and the state. Germany had to use paper based on an hours worth of work per mark because they did not have enough gold and silver to issue real money. The post war reparations would have stripped germany of much of its gold and silver reserves.

    One should view the paper mark as an improvisation rather than a permanent monetary reform. Remember what paper money did to germans in the early 1920s. They were financially ruined! That is the fruit of all paper and electronic money schemes. You Americans will soon find this out the hard way.

  1. katana

    August 31, 2013 at 9:52 am

    Steven wrote, August 30, 2013 at 6:29 pm:

    As for the money problem a system of metallic money minted by the state is the solution. Every other form of money is a device of the jews created to enslave and bankrupt the people and the state. Germany had to use paper based on an hours worth of work per mark because they did not have enough gold and silver to issue real money. The post war reparations would have stripped germany of much of its gold and silver reserves.

    One should view the paper mark as an improvisation rather than a permanent monetary reform. Remember what paper money did to germans in the early 1920s. They were financially ruined! That is the fruit of all paper and electronic money schemes. You Americans will soon find this out the hard way.
    —————

    With respect Steven, I think you’ve only partly got it. The issue of a ‘money system’ is both simple and complex, resulting in all sorts of odd ideas from so-called experts.

    I’m no ‘expert’, but this is my take on it all.

    To get beyond a barter system we need some form of recognized token system that represents ‘work’ done. At its simplest a ‘token’ is something that says that you have performed some unit of work that is of value to your community. In a simple community it might mean you have produced so many kilograms of food.

    Ideally the tokens need to be unique to prevent forgery. Candidates include very hard to come by things like precious stones or metals or complicated patterns on paper. But in principle, if everyone was completely honest, it could be almost anything, but usually long lasting objects.

    So, one hour of standard unskilled farm worker by an average male could be equal to one Mark. Working as a rocket scientist for one hour could be worth tens Marks. Each person is given tokens for their ‘labor’. Each token can then be exchanged for their equivalent in goods and services. If it takes 100 tokens to produce 100 kg of pork then an unskilled farm worker needs to work 100 hours to get his ‘pig’.

    It’s that simple. Precious metals and so on are completely and utterly irrelevant. Any kind of token, and paper tokens due to their light weight are very convenient, can be used.

    But whether we use gold, silver (all kind of useless because of their limited physical supply) or any other token representing an hour of work is a completely separate issue from who controls our financial systems. Simply put, having jews in control is having criminals in control. They are quite happy with any token system that they can game, whether we use gold, paper, foreskins or seashells.

    Jews in control will manipulate and cheat us in every way they can and do especially with their ‘cut’ via their ‘interest system’ that they promote.

    Gold, silver, etc is 100% NOT required and makes no sense.

    What is required is honesty in the token system, aka, money system. Hitler’s Germany did that with unparalleled success.

  1. CSR

    August 31, 2013 at 7:33 pm

    Steven do you have no knowledge of the Populists in the USA that were actually forerunners of N.S.? These ugly J-pigs were known to them and the J-s did everything in their power to disrupt, defame and disregard the White Populist movement. Jew financial scams, aka as banking, always equates to a ripoff eventually. Read this… it is how the J-Tribe played Gold and Silver back in the day when it actually carried weight as the “coin of the realm”. J-Tribe money changing has been with us for a very long time and it has never been an IndoEuropean function.

    http://projects.vassar.edu/1896/antisemitism.html (The “Cross of Gold” that the J-Tribers were hanging White Americans on.)
    http://thesilverbomb.com/why-silver-and-gold-have-been-the-money-of-history/

  1. CSR

    August 31, 2013 at 10:02 pm

    Charts on the J-Scams:

    http://chartistfriendfrompittsburgh.blogspot.com/2013/08/if-cash-is-king-then-credit-is-god.html

    http://vimeo.com/37914298

    The “money changers” crucified Jesus for exposing their usury.

    Jesus got violent 1 time with only one group of people. He called the “money changers” “thieves” as they perp interest/usury on the people. Interest/usury/riba is a mathematic fraud like a Ponzi. Each will always create victims with 100% certainty. It is IMPOSSIBLE for all borrowers to repay their debts as more debt is created then money circulated.

    Jesus is one of hundreds of millions who have died an early death due to “engineered scarcity” as a consequence due to usury. War, famine, fear, foreclosure, bankruptcy, and loss of sovereignty all occur as a result of usury.

  1. wobbly

    August 31, 2013 at 11:18 pm

    @katana

    Correct. Metal money isn’t a solution in itself. In the past, metal money was debased just as much simply through mixing it with base metals i.e. taxes would come in as silver coins and it would be melted down in the official mint and new coins made mixed with a little tin or lead. IIRC the Roman silver coins were something like 0.02% silver by the time their roman economy collapsed.

    In particular, metal money when you have a massive trade imbalance can’t work for very long as all your gold and silver will flow out of the country.

    The German system may have resulted from a crisis but it is a *better* system. A nation’s money is effectively backed by the right to tax the labour of the nation’s population so in effect it is a measure of what that nation’s labour is worth. Nation-states should issue their own money on that explicit basis. It makes much more sense.

    The problem is the money-changers not the money.

  1. Monty Storm

    September 1, 2013 at 7:15 pm

    I certainly am not an expert on the Federal Reserve or our money system, but I think Mr. Bruce McCarthy has an excellent video on youtube called Bank Fraud in 10 minutes. Perhaps Mr. Hadding might have a different opinion concerning the Federal Reserve system if he watched that video.

Add new comment