"The International Jew" Study Hour - Episode 17
Oct. 18, 2012
Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott take a short time to look into Peter Myer’s work on the “authenticity question” regarding the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion." Carolyn gives a synopsis of Meyers’ main pro-authenticity arguments which can be found at http://mailstar.net/toolkit.html. Hadding disagrees with Meyers.
They then read and complete Chapter 14, “Did the Jews Foresee the World War?” According to this chapter, the “Jewish plan” was to participate in some way in the events leading up to the war and the war itself in order to gain a place at the “peace conference” following the war.
Image: Battle of the Somme, 1916, one of the largest battles of World War I with more than one million casualties.
Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.
Bookmark/Search this post with
- 782 reads
Comments
Original comments on this program
5 Responses
EditorNEMW
October 19, 2012 at 10:38 am
For the proper stance on the Protocols and the history surrounding this whole Jewish revolutionary movement the best single source is The Controversy Of Zion by Douglas Reed. It covers all of the history from Cromwell on in depth. It is not perfect but has been mostly corroborated.
Carolyn
October 19, 2012 at 12:12 pm
On Peter Meyers’ pages what Douglas Reed has written about the Protocols is covered also. I read it, but Reed doesn’t “prove” anything either. DR is also guilty of doing some damage to real history in his book about Otto Strasser in Canada, so I don’t take him as a pillar of honesty and reliability anymore. As to being the “best single source” and “mostly corroborated,” you need to give more details as to why that is so for your comment to be helpful. The question that has come up is not just “the proper stance” but the question of authenticity, which comes down to who is responsible for the content of the version of TPOTLEOZ that Nilus introduced in 1905 — Jews or antisemites?
Fallout Shelter 7
October 19, 2012 at 5:18 pm
Another excellent show Carolyn.I would like it if you gave Hadding more of a chance to argue his points.It would make discussion and debate between you two even more informative and enjoyable.
Carolyn
October 19, 2012 at 9:39 pm
Well, yes. Hadding had made his points before so I tend to think people remember them. It was not Hadding who wanted to discuss the Peter Meyers arguments, I did, and he went along with it. He has not read them, by choice. I know I did cut him off too much, but we did have a chapter we wanted to read too and I did know how much of the Myers stuff I wanted to fit in. We can always come back to this and I would actually like to before we complete the Protocols section in TIJ. Why don’t you write to Hadding and ask him what more he might want to say about it? I’m sure we can fit it in next week. Hadding and I get along very well off-air as well as on, and don’t really differ about much.
BTW, I was really impressed with Hadding’s reading of Chapter 14 – going back and forth between different voices so much and keeping it straight. I know I would have gotten mixed up somewhere. Hadding is really quite the showman!
Hadding
October 20, 2012 at 5:13 pm
I am sorry that the audio on my voice is distorted in places. It might be necessary for me to hold the microphone even farther away (than about 9″ as I have been doing), or not talk so loud.