See also Podcast: Kevin MacDonald's problem with holocaust revisionism (2017)

By Carolyn Yeager

KEVIN MACDONALD RECENTLY PARTICIPATED IN a videocast of “Torah Talk” with Luke Ford, a non-ethnically Jewish student of Torah and Talmud, and two young friends or students of his. It lasted one hour and 50 minutes and resulted in some interesting insights into Kevin's limitations as a leading White Nationalist voice.

MacDonald was taken by surprise with the first question asked of him: What are your thoughts about holocaust revisionism?

“Yeah, um, I guess I'm not, uh, I've never had any sympathy really, before – I, I haven't seen, I haven't seen anything that I would really, you know, convince me. And I have – frankly, I haven't dealt into it very much. My view is that it's not important for what I'm doing and I don't think it's really important – I, I think what's really important is the culture of the holocaust, you know how it's taught in school, how it's used to defend Israel, and it's used as a weapon against people who oppose immigration, and all those things – ah I think those are very important things to discuss. So whether it actually happened, exactly (… slurs some words] and all that is something that I don't think uh is possible to even go there anymore, is just … just uh … third rail.”

L to R: Andreas Wild, Björn Höcke, Hans-Joachim Berg of the Alternative fur Deutschland party in Thuringia.

by Carolyn Yeager

DISAPPOINTINGLY (BUT FOR THE SAKE OF PARTY HEALING OBVIOUSLY), the leader of the AfD in Thuringia state took a step back and, while speaking at a state party meeting today (Saturday) in Arnstadt announced, “"I took a big, important topic and unfortunately turned it into beer hall talk. That was a mistake. For that, I would like to apologize here."

He was referring to a speech in Dresden on January 17 in which he correctly described the grotesque Berlin Holocaust memorial as a “monument to shame” and said Germans should instead be encouraged to look forward to a proud future, not always back to a past of only 12 years length. Those words were well-received by the AfD youth organization to which he was speaking, but naturally brought loud criticism from the center and left political parties and establishment Jews.

by Carolyn Yeager

THE FULL TITLE IS THE HOLOCAUST: AN INTRODUCTION -- EXPLORING THE EVIDENCE, which may mean it is the first of a series and there is at least one more coming. I didn't ask about that because this slender paperback of 120 pages stands alone just fine. Some might say about this book: Do we need another introductory level revisionist book? Hasn't it all been covered already?

Yes to both questions. We need this book because its fundamental premise is that the debate is over, the revisionists have won. It makes clear that unless the holocaust historians – or the keepers of the holocaust, as I would call that group – can come up with some new evidence for their claims, they have lost. What this book sets out to prove, in very simple language, is that the standard holocaust story is not based on evidence at all, never has been, for the reason there is no evidence for it. Lacking evidence, the keepers of the holocaust rely on the cooperation of the law, the mainstream media in its broadest sense, and the most prestigious academic institutions to give the official WW2 narrative public credibility.

Image

By Carolyn Yeager

Now 105 years old, Brunhilde Pomsel says, “Nobody will believe me, because everyone thinks we knew everything. But the truth is we didn’t know anything.”

She's right that the mainstream media and governments today don't want to believe that. But it's confirmed by the true scholarship about the period, as contrasted to the war propaganda that passes for truth today.

If the murder of 6 million Jews in concentration camp gas chambers was really going on, everyone would have known about it. It could not have remained a “secret” and this is the big problem with the holocaust lie – it had to have been kept from the German population or they would have rebelled against Hitler's government, but there is no way it could have been kept from them if it were really taking place. 

A survivor at a memorial service in Nagasaki, Japan last year.

BARACK OBAMA IS MAKING THE FIRST U. S. Presidential visit to Hiroshima on May 27 and the big question is: will he apologize for dropping the first atomic bomb on that city in August 1945 that killed 140,000 people. He says he will not and majority American opinion is probably against it. It would cut into our myth of being the good guys, fighting the good war against the evil Nazis and the dirty Japs. We all know the story very well.

I'm calling what happened to the people of that city, and was repeated three days later in Nagasaki, instantly killing 73,000 more people with one radioactive bomb … a holocaust. A true holocaust worthy of the name because the people were burned, roasted, radioactivated – something that never happened in the so-called, falsely-name “Holocaust” in Europe. And that wasn't the end of it. In Hiroshima, the bomb instantly killed 80,000 to 140,000, but seriously injured 100,000 more. It caused a black rain to fall, composed of dirt, dust, soot and highly radioactive particles that contaminated even areas remote from the explosion.

Benjamin Netanyahu graciously receives one of his many standing ovations from a joint session of Congress (minus 58 miscreants of the Democrat Party) earlier this year.

How Republicans can help Netanyahu

By Hadding Scott

On October 20th, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu stirred major controversy by declaring before the 37th World Zionist Congress that Adolf Hitler never wanted to kill all the Jews of Europe, and that it was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem who made him do it, because the Mufti did not want more Jews coming to Palestine.

Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time; he wanted to expel the Jews. And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said: “If you expel them, they’ll all come here.” “So what should I do with them?” he asked. He said: “Burn them!”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ju1w-iDR0o

Given the great esteem with which all Christian Zionists and Republicans, and especially Republican congressmen, regard the Israeli Prime Minister, this statement and the reaction to it must be a source of great concern.

Greville Janner standing in front of a 50th Anniversary poster for the founding of Israel, probably in 1998, alongside Labour politician Tony Blair.

In spite of all efforts to close down prosecution of pedophile "Lord" Greville Janner, his case is staying alive via public pressure and the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission). You can read the latest story from BBC here: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leicestershire-32539660

The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) said it would look at how Leicestershire Police dealt with complaints made in 1991, 2001 and 2006.
The force referred itself to the IPCC over the matter in September 2014.
The Crown Prosecution Service said despite evidence to charge the former Leicester MP, he was unfit for trial.
Lord Janner, who has dementia, has been linked with a string of historic child sex abuse allegations during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s.
In a statement, the IPCC said: "The IPCC investigation is in its early stages and terms of reference will be set in due course."
[...]
Justice Lowell Goddard, a New Zealand judge, who was appointed chairman of the inquiry by the Home Secretary, could call Lord Janner to give evidence.

I wrote about Janner in 2011 because I stumbled upon him in my research on Denis Avey, the holocaust hoaxter who was enabled by the BBC, the Labour Party, and the Holocaust Education Trust (HET) closely involved with the Board of Deputies of British Jews, of which Greville Janner had been President from 1979 to '85. Because of the resurgence of attention on these sex crimes, I'm recycling my article below. It is currently #7 on the list of Most Popular Articles on Carolyn Yeager.net front page with close to 30,000 reads, but considering it's newsworthiness today, it should be 1,000,000! So maybe together we can give it more attention.

*      *      *

Known Pedophile is Instrumental in Promoting Holocaust Hoaxer and Plagiarizer Denis Avey's New Book

By Carolyn Yeager, 2011
copyright 2011 Carolyn Yeager

An astounding admission from a Jewish American psychologist is found in an article in the current (Summer 2012) issue of Inconvenient History Journal. It's titled "On The Roads of Truth: Searching for Warwick Hester" by Klaus Schwensen.

Schwensen tells of a certain "Warwick Hester" who, in the 1950's, wrote "critically about the 6-million number and the Jewish death toll in what has since became known as 'the Holocaust.'"

Warwick Hester mentions the increase of the Jewish world population by 3 million between 1933 and 1950, which of course is in contradiction to the 6 million murdered by the Nazis. In this connection, he tells the following story:

"Recently when talking to a North American of Jewish origin whom I esteem very much I referred to that discrepancy [of Jewish population numbers]. I asked him whether he himself believed in earnest that the Nazis had killed 6 millions. He said:´Naturally not. For that they had neither the time nor the means. What they obviously had, was the intention. Here begins politics [i.e. the psychology of propaganda]. Given the imputed intention, you can make any number. We thought that 6 millions are not too much to appear plausible, but sufficient to make mankind shiver for one century. This chance Hitler has given to us, and we make the most of it, to good effect, as you see.´ I said he ought to consider that a political lie like this will, in light of subsequent investigation, disclose itself and turn against those who invented it. But this Jew, a psychologist, denied that. It [the propaganda] had penetrated too deep into the subconscious of the masses, so that it could never be dislodged. Humans in general are completely uncritical. What is anchored in the subconscious, even an individual with common sense almost never is able to expunge. As a proof he cited the fact that already now [1954!], after a relatively short propagandistic campaign, that item required no further discussion. ´We have no problem, since we have created a historical fact which from now on is in the history books of schools, like the date of a battle.´" (my emphasis -cy)

I believe this Jew was speaking honestly to his colleague Warwick Hester and that many educated Jews, including "holocaust historians," know the truth of this perfectly well. In other words, they don't believe it, but they profess it anyway.