The Heretics' Hour: The Demise of The White Network - What Happened?

A good broadcast.  Glad you're continuing your work which provides entertainment and enlightement to so many.  I liked Tan but  obviously, for whatever reason, your association was no longer viable.   

<p>Given the topic I can't say I enjoyed the program. But it was educational and obviously it was necessary for you to get your side out Carolyn.<br><br>As you put emphasis on you being a "truth-teller", I will give you what I see the truth is from my admittedly limited point of view, but as someone who has listened (and commented occasionally) to both of your programs right from the beginning.<br><br>I think it is simply a case of a conflict of personalities. More specifically a kind of power struggle, and one that is amplified by the male/female nature of it.<br><br>You have an extroverted, domineering, aggressive aspect to your personality that seeks to control openly. While Tan has a more introverted, non-domineering, non-aggressive aspect that seeks to control via more subtle methods.<br><br>The result is, over time, a build up of resentment on Tan's part as his "clear signals" to "back off" and to show "due respect" to him are not picked up and acted on by you, Carolyn.<br><br>I think Tan was willing to tolerate a partnership where you both wear "trousers" in the household, but became gradually and then suddenly angry when it dawned on him that his trousers had over time turned into a dress. And no self-respecting man can tolerate that.<br><br>So, the result was his sudden "rash" action, triggered by some last straw "idealogical" difference of opinion.<br><br>I think you are both at fault. After thrashing your differences out please then put it aside and turn back to what you both do best — fighting for our race.</p>

Not a good idea to wash dirty linen in public for our enemies to laugh at.

Whatever different views you have had on WN, Tan's action show emotional irrationality. Katana is probably right. His cry-baby behavior is just projected on this topic. There is more behind it. Or Tan just got scared and bailed out without admitting his cowardliness. 

And I don't think the enemy laughs as long as Carolyn continues. They would only be satified if Carolyn would be forced to shut up, if the White Network were her only outlet. So, if this attack was sabotage, nice try but it didn't work.  

If Tan had a valid point, he would convince Carolyn with rational arguments that she is wrong. Tan proved himself to be unstable, and a bad business partner, regardless of the cause of the network. Instead of showing off immature behavior, I would be interested in an open discussion on White Nationalism, Eurasionsm, European nationalism, pan-Europeanism, pan-Slavism, pan-Germanism etc. and if that alone is enough or if a world view needs to be attached to these concepts. Obviously, there is room for discussion and co-existence. A White Nationalism-only imperative sounds very one-sided. 

1) It is incontrovertable that Carolyn Yeager is and has always been the registered OWNER of the still-registered thewhitenetwork.com.

2) It was publically hijacked and STOLEN on 04-15-2014: 

" I have decided, without consulting with or seeking Carolyn Yeager's consent, that The White Network will no longer be used to record or broadcast any new programs. There will be no further posts or comments. -TANSTAAFL "

3) Carolyn Yeager's STOLEN website has now been cloned in its entirety, with newly added posts and comments of actionable slander and actionable defamation:

thewhitenetwork-archive.com

I'm sending Carolyn a donation so she can hire lawyers to prosecute this brazen crime:

www.flexyourrights.org/assets/Jury.Box_.jpg

Hi Carolyn,

If you recall I had put a nasty comment or 2 on one of your shows where it looked to me like you were attempting to replace the Jewish Problem with a German problem.  I was of course the rash one in those comments and hope tanstaafl wasn't negatively influenced by them in any way.  When I posted something along those lines that you probably should have deleted my nasty knee-jerk comments I honestly meant just that.  It wasn't some type of "I used to be a WN but now I'm not" comment.  I'm interested in Holocaust research as I think you know.  I thought you and tanstaafl would kiss and make up in a day or 2 and am entering my 2 cents now to un-influence tanstaafl if it was in fact the case that he took my nasty comments in the wrong way.  I am not and never have been a WN, although I like David Duke's positions on a number of things nowadays (I'm aware you think he's a milquetoast).

Interesting show; with all the complications surrounding Tan it is better that you two went your separate ways.  I had also noticed that Tan had put up the old archives of the White Network.  It is totally counterproductive of him to make the network archives available only to tear them down with a sophomoric rant against you on the homepage.  I thought you did a fair job critiquing the situation and you are a "truth teller".  

I would have to agree with Tan's skepticism on the 9-11 Truth movement however; I fear that taking it seriously may detract and compromise the revisionism work that you have done.  

You stated that you listen to Rush Limbaugh; I would like to hear your critique on him.  I can understand some of Rush's criticism on environmentalism but I find him ignorant about natural sciences and he cares next to nothing about conserving our natural heritage.  

I also watched the video on the Occidental Observer which covered Britian's changing demographics; you are correct to point out that an economic collapse may stop the flow of non-Europeans; an environmental collapse could hasten economic problems.  For example the recent droughts in California have effected food prices.

Carolyn, so glad you continue the battle for white people and the truth (via your Carolyn Yeager website and broadcasts) no matter how painful it may personally and professionally be to you. You have the spirit of a true Aryan warrioress.

Simply because Tan administered the website and provided music for thewhitenetwork, does not mean he had any capability to bring to the network the genius that you, Carolyn, bring to us all multiple times each week. You are a true jewel and a blessing to all Whites of pan-aryan persuasion. Do not be discouraged.  Your programs are needed so much, as they provide moral and valuable mental/emotional support to all thinking whites who are starved for the truth. 

I would love it is you could get Paul Hickman back, as he gives great insight into the British white nationalist scene and I also enjoyed and looked forward to his program each Sunday.

I listened to your first (post Tan) broadcast of AH Tabletalk 042414 and thought it was just fine as far as quality of broadcast, volume, etc.

Tan has some issues with you and if he were any kind of a white aryan gentleman, he would have addressed those issues to you  directly and privately. Instead he consciously chose to blow up your differences and blow up TWN in the process.  So, all things considered, you are far better off without Tan, so you might want to consider what happened a blessing in disguise.

Carolyn, did you get it all off your chest ?

Now stop letting time pirates steer your ship and move on.

The trees have bared their fruit, it's sour tasting, the trash has exposed themselves with just a wee nudge.

Carolyn, I am more than happy for you to delete this if you wish.

I want to make the point that if you made a comment on the old WN site, it said, "Your comment is awaiting mderation". That was helpful to someone making a comment. You knew it was posted subject to moderation.

Here it does not say anything, so you don't know as a commenter, if the comment was made successfully or if it disappeared into the ether, and if you actually saw it! Also I note that some commenters have a "Not verified" tag next to their name. That looks as if some people made comments without your prior approval. It leads me to think that maybe my comment never got through.

The comment I made here was about Tan having a Jewish family and how that would be bound to bite you sooner or later. I notice no one else made a similar comment, so I assume you had your reasons if you deleted such comments.

I have no problem with you moderating, altering or deleting a comment I might make and in the past I was glad you did! But that is not the point I am trying to make.

Hi Ms. Yeager,

Sorry to hear about the demise of the White Network. I knew that Tan was a good for nothing man.

Keep up the good work.

Faithfully,

k0nsl

None of these 'movements' are real. They're created, controlled and lead by the establishment to corral and manage undesirables, who might otherwise be doing something revolutionary. 

This TAN individual smacks of a handler to me. He went into damage control mode as soon as it became clear that the integrity of his fellow assets in the 'movement' (and the 'movement' itself) was threatened by Carolyn continuing her work.

Carolyn's shows are interesting, but Tanstaafl has always been a pseudo-intellectual bore - he's like a spoiled kid who takes his ball home so that no one else can play -who's he to define precisely what white nationalism is - who died and made him the expert? - this is nothing other than censorship, on his part, if you ask me.

What's most offensive about Tanstaafl is all of the self-righteous nonsense he spews, attempting to convince any who'll listen that he's some sort of leader in the white nationalist movement. He portrays himself as a hero who is defending the cause, and in so doing he wants us to believe that Carolyn is somehow morally inferior to him, such that he feels obliged to cast her out, as an enemy of white nationalism. This characterization is absurd....there are plenty of disagreements among those who identify themselves as "white nationalists", and there's no real consensus among proponents as to how the term should be defined. To characterize Carolyn as an opponent of white nationalism is simply ridiculous, as anyone who follows her work knows.