By Carolyn Yeager

The 125th anniversary of Hitler's birth on April 20th coincides with the publication of the “antisemitic” notebooks of German philosopher Martin Heidegger, arguably the most influential European philosopher of the 20th century (only Ludwig Wittgenstein rivals him for the title) according to this article.

There are other connections between the two. They were born in the same year, 1889. Heidegger joined Hitler's National-Socialist party, the NSDAP, in 1933 when Hitler became Chancellor and he remained a member until 1945. He served as rector of Freiburg University in Baden-Württemberg for one year, from 1933 to 1934. He praised the "inner truth and greatness" of National-Socialism during a lecture in 1935. Never once did Heidegger express a word of moral condemnation of the Nazis or the "Holocaust."

On the other hand, there is said to be no evidence that Heidegger accepted National-Socialist racial theories, but that doesn't absolve him because the notebooks contain passages denouncing "world Jewry," the distinctively Jewish "talent for calculation," and the "collusion of 'rootless' Jews in both international capitalism and communism."

April 12, 2014

Map of Eurasia for Eurasian Political Movement - Oct. 10, 2012 (click to enlarge)

Carolyn questions whether White Nationalism “worldwide” can work, then points to various reports that show Putin is no friend of White Nationalists, followed by a look at Eurasianism and what it means to the West. Some highlights:

• Three men can be said to be responsible for what is called White Nationalism today: Willis Carto, William Pierce and David Duke – all Americans;
• White Nationalism is an American phenomenon that has more recently taken hold with some Europeans, too;
• A website that sees White Nationalism as Internationalism dressed up in a racial overcoat, and promotes the separation of Eastern Europeans from Western Europeans, culturally;
• “Holocaust” denial laws and other free speech suppression in Putin’s Russia;
• Andrew Anglin’s insincere apologies and why they should not be accepted;
• “Intellectual Eurasianism” as explained by Jobbik leader Gabor Vona;
• The incredible permanent annual honoring of Lubavitch Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (born in Russia) on “Education Day, USA” since 1978!
  

April 7, 2014

Tanstaafl, Paul Hickman, Ray Goodwin and I discussed the issue that moral legitimacy is taken, not given;  the sensitive Russia-Ukraine-Crimea situation; Israeli efforts to have Jewish U.S. spy Jonathan Pollard released from U.S. incarceration. Main topics:

• Ways White guilt can be thrown off  by seeing it as having no legitimate basis;
• Jewish aggression against us comes from the Christian Churches as much as from the TV, according to our panel;
• Is Russia’s President Putin one of us or one of them;
• The strategic importance of Crimea and the craziness of another war between closely related White people;
• Why freeing Jonathan Pollard is of paramount importance to the Israelis despite the fact it could be bad public relations;
• “Disparate Impact” federal school program continues the attack on white schoolchildren – what will be the result?

Image: No matter how "good" you are, you're still bad, White person.

March 29, 2014

The malaise of Whites can be attributed to our susceptibility to attacks on our virtue, mainly driven by Jewish interests that control vast segments of society, such as media, religion and education. To defend ourselves we need a tough skin and a deep loyalty to our folk. Some highlights:

• The contradictions of Russia, and the emigration of Russians into Western Europe;
• The different cultures within the White race, and how that can affect following a single, central leadership;
• The royal family of Russia (the Romanovs) were actually of German blood; even the Bulgarian and Albanian monarchs took German, Italian and Spanish wives;
• Kevin MacDonald’s identification of “moral legitimacy” as the main problem White’s have is spot-on, but how we demonstrate our “goodness” is debatable;
• Jews and non-Whites are unceasingly at work trying to instill guilt in Whites – we can only counter it by believing we are intrinsically good;
• Dr. Rafael Medoff, a true rat-faced jew, accuses Roosevelt’s ambassador to Germany Thomas Dodd of antisemitism for using the words ‘Chosen People’ in a private letter in 1934;
• The Eugenic Movement should be defended as good across the board, as a right of every people to improve itself.

Image: Booklet given to German boys and girls when they finished basic school - summarizes concepts as folk, fatherland, Reich, race, duty, comradeship and patriotism. Part of their duty was to find the right mate and create at least four children.

Introduction to the German translation of
Douglas Reed’s book
“The Controversy of Zion”
By Jürgen Graf

1. The Controversy of Zion

Douglas Reeds monumental work has two evident weaknesses which should be pointed out from the outset:

Reeds references are insufficient. For example, the title of Josef Kastein's “History and Destiny of the Jews” (1933), his most frequently quoted source, does not appear anywhere in the original English text; he simply keeps mentioning “Dr. Kastein's book”, and leaves it to the reader to find the title in the (surprisingly meager) bibliography in the appendix. In such cases I, as the translator, could correct that and insert the relevant book titles in the text. I could not find out on which page the quotations in question are to be found, for such information is not to be found in Reed's text, and the purchase of the original texts would have involved unreasonable expenses. Similarly with the newspaper articles: here one must be content when Reed mentions the name of the newspaper in question, and ideally also the date on which the quoted article was published. Often he gives as his source “A South African newspaper” which makes it impossible to trace the quotation.

In the frequent quotations from The Old Testament, especially in the first chapter, Reed typically mentions that it comes from, for example, “The Book of Leviticus” of “from The Book of Ezekiel”.  As a translation back from the English text was out of the question, I spent many days in finding the passages in question, and thus got to know The Old Testament better.

March 17, 2014

A program featuring two anniversaries and three “enemies inside the gate. We must keep reminding ourselves and others that those who call themselves “the good guys” are just the opposite, and who the good guys really are. Some highlights:

• New York St. Patrick’s Day Parade organizers forbade the display of LGBT signs and displays, causing the new Mayor Blasio to boycott the parade — ditto the Guinness and other beer companies;
• The real joy of the Austrian-Germans to join the German Reich is still denied and lied about today, in order to uphold the false WWII/evil “Nazis” narrative;
• Adolf Hitler’s speech on March 15, 1938 at Vienna’s Heldenplatz to 200,000 rapt listeners declared that bringing the oldest eastern province back into the Reich was his “greatest accomplishment”;
• Dietrich Bonhoeffer, young ecumenical pastor of the “Confessing Church” which opposed the National-Socialist attempt to create a National German Christian Church,  was an early opponent of the Hitler regime who ended up a full traitor with the German “Resistance”;
• Pastor Martin Niemoeller, author of “First they came for the communists” and one of the founders of the Confessing Church,  first supported the National-Socialists, then decided he opposed the “Aryan Paragraph” which had existed since 1885;
• Edward Miliband, 45-year old son of Polish Jewish parents who emigrated to Britain in 1940 and 1947, is now an MP for Doncaster North and head of the Labour Party;
• Carolyn reads a column written by him in 2012 that reveals how Miliband manages to tell both the British and the British Jews what he wants each of them to hear.

Image: Ed Miliband, leader of the Labour Party in Britain and a 100% Polish Jew with no British blood, explains why he's good for Britain.

The Southern Poverty Law Center thinks it knows quite a bit about hate. They have created a map of the United States and listed what they consider to be "hate groups" in each state. How cute! Except that this website, carolynyeager.net, is not a group, but an individual, personal site. They're not following their own rules which state:

Hate group activities can include criminal acts, marches, rallies, speeches, meetings, leafleting or publishing. Websites appearing to be merely the work of a single individual, rather than the publication of a group, are not included in this list.

In any case, others are going after them and it is good to see. This is from cnsnews.com ...

February 27, 2014

Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott discuss Henry Ford’s famous trial in 1927, his formal so-called “statement of apology,” and its effect on his long-term influence as an anti-Jewish voice.

• “The International Jew” series of articles in The Dearborn Independent covered every aspect of Jewish influence on and in America;
• Even after the articles that make up “The International Jew” were completed in Jan. 1922, The Dearborn Independent continued to publish tough criticism until 1927 (as in 1924 story at right);
• Jewish and liberal reaction against Ford’s newspaper was strong, but did not deter him,
• In 1925, lawyer and farm organizer Aaron Sapiro filed a one-million dollar  libel suit against Ford for the article shown at right — which went to trial in 1927;
• Rather than take the witness stand, Ford preferred to settle, agreeing to stop publishing The Dearborn Independent and destroy all existing pamphlets containing the articles;
• While Ford lived up to his agreement, in 1949 there appeared in England and the U.S. a 174-page one-volume abridgment of the text under the title of “The International Jew”;
• Today, The International Jew can be read on the Internet and bought in bookstores, so Henry Ford seems to have won.
  

Click Image to enlarge: The Dearborn Independent's April 19, 1924 investigative reporting on Aaron Sapiro and "pals" organizing of farmers -- calling it Jewish exploitation. Left to right: Albert D. Lasker, Sapiro, Eugene Meyer Jr, Bernard Baruch.

Note: We have been using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Feb. 20, 2014

Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott read and comment on Chapter 80, “An Address to “Gentiles” on the Jewish Question.”

The FINAL CHAPTER of The International Jew is not only a reminder  of the unity of Jews (which is the basis of their strength) vs. the disunity of “Gentiles,” but also an exhortation to the “superior strain” of the non-Jewish races  to liberate itself from the influence of Jewish Orientalism.

• Our Race, the White European “superior strain,” must unite in the moral and religious principles that made our race great to begin with;
• The solution to the Jewish Question will begin in the United States, but not by the mass of people but by a sufficient number of qualified people who are not timid or soft;
• Unrestricted immigration of ideas has been as bad for the American mentality as unrestricted immigration of people is bad for American society;
• “The Chosen People” is one of two great biblical ideas, but Jews are not that people – the House of Israel and the House of Judah are distinct to this day;
• The solution at this stage is to disengage from, to eschew the poisonous ideas and entertainments that Jewry offers to us.

Image:  In approximately 930 B.C.E., the short-lived United Monarchy, which ruled over all the tribes of Israel, was divided into two kingdoms: Israel in the north, led by Jeroboam son of Nebat, and Judea in the South, led by Rehoboam the son of Solomon.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.