Sept. 17, 2012

Carolyn Yeager starts up an anti-circumcision awareness campaign by reviewing the ‘cons’ of circumcision (there aren’t any ‘pros’ ) – while our mass media and medical establishment refuse to mention that there are any ‘cons.’  Female circumcision is banned in every White European-descent country, but not male circumcision. The easy answer as to why: because Jews practice male circumcision as a religious rite.

Topics include:

• The lack of any positive benefits from circumcision beyond vague health claims that don’t withstand scrutiny;
• Stopping Jewish terminolgy – the word’ intact’ used in place of ‘uncircumcised;’
• Original purpose of circumcision was to reduce sexual pleasure;
• U.S. has highest circumcision rate among White countries, but it has come down drastically since it’s peak in 1965;
• Problems in boys, from ADHD to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome may relate to circumcision;
• The banning of circumcision by a regional court in Germany and all the ramifications that have followed;
• The history of circumcision in Jewish scriptures;
• Alan Dershowitz cries “Shame on Germany!“

Sept 15, 2012

John Beattie tells how he created the British Peoples’ League for the first time in 1975, helped by his wife. John is proud of his Scottish-English family roots in Toronto, and remembers with pleasure that it was an all-white city during his childhood and youth.  He talks about the importance of keeping safe our White and national/ethnic identities – in his case among the British Canadians, but tied together with the British everywhere.

We get the story of John’s “nazi” past (1965-71), straight from the horse’s mouth.  Highlights include:

• John is agitated by a brochure “Who is tampering with the Soul of America?” written by Ron Gostick;
• He reads it to a meeting of the Social Credit Party where Canadian Jewish Congress members are present;
• These members adopt Beattie as the leader of a new political party they insist on calling The Canadian Nazi Party;
• Ronald Bottaro and John and Chris Dingle become Beattie’s bodyguards, but admit later on a CBC radio Don Sim’s show they were actually agents for the Canadian Jewish Congress;
• Beattie was carried along by the “excitement” and all the booze that was provided;
• His handler was John Charles Garrity, who wrote about it in Maclean’s Magazine;
• The rent check that proved there was no real nazi party organization or headquarters;
• Beattie’s account of the Paul Fromm/Ernst Zundel hearing in 2000.

Sept 13, 2012

Hadding Scott and Carolyn Yeager read and comment on Chapter 10:  “An Introduction to the Jewish Protocols.”

The documents most frequently mentioned by those who are interested in the theory of Jewish World Power rather than in the actual operation of that power in the world today, are those 24 documents known as “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.” Who gave it the name of “Elders of Zion” is not known [but it is] the most comprehensive program for world subjugation that has ever come to public knowledge. (From Chapt. 10, The International Jew)
 

Before beginning Chapter 10, your hosts complete the last part of the long Chapter 9 from the previous week: “The Historic Basis of Jewish Imperialism.”

Image: Called the Jew-Bolshevic Emblem surrounded by the Symbolic Serpent, this mysterious illustration was used on an edition of The Jewish Peril: Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, published by “The Britons”, 62 Oxford Street, London. Fifth Edition, 1921.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Franz Seiler wrote, in response to the Gerhard Ittner post (slightly edited by me):

As far as I understand these procedures, trials, law-suits on revisionism it's the following. I sent these lines to the law-court Mannheim, commenting to the [current] case of Günter Deckert...

Comment to the verdict of the Landgericht [district court]  Mannheim concerning the case Mattogno-Deckert, a statement, plea of the judge at the LG Herrn Roos, and the Verfassungsbeschwerde [constitutional complaint] of  4 Sept. 2012:

The plea of the judge, Herrn Roos, proves that these lawsuits on revisionism are held without any recourse to the matter on hand.

The statement of the judge Herrn Roos also proves that he thinks he is to come to a verdict against the accused person without any recourse to the matter on hand. This is following a still valid stipulation in the so-called Überleitungsvertrag [transition agreement] of 1953ff that deutsche Stellen (German authorities. e.g. also law-courts) are not to question measures and decisions of the Allies concerning events from 1933 to 1945 and after that time.

If such deutsche Stellen [German law courts] are not to question measures and decisions, they are also not to investigate such measures and decisions, and they also are not to judge upon such measures and decisions. All of these measures are "off limits" to them!

If they demand jurisdiction on these matters they are demanding a right which they do not have!

(This is slightly simplified - for I don't know the terms of jurisdiction in English of what I wrote in German to the Landgericht Mannheim.)

I'm convinced that German law-courts have no jurisdiction on the matters referred to in the Überleitungsvertrag [transition agreement]. The absolutely silly way they conduct such trials, denying enquiries into the matter to be tried, also prove this. So they also do not have the right to issue a European Arrest Warrant for this.

Best wishes,
Franz Seiler

Image

Yesterday I received a letter from Gerhard Ittner, who since April is being held in a prison in Lisbon fighting extradition to Germany for "thought crimes" related to the "Holocaust." Ittner had been evading the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) "justice" for 7 years; he has been in Portugal for most of that time.

But then the FRG issued a European Arrest Warrant for Ittner, which must be honored Europe-wide, and Ittner decided to risk arrest for the chance to bring his case to the International or European courts. He began writing again under a nom de plume, knowing he would sooner or later be discovered.

I interviewed Henrik Holappa about Ittner on July 7th, and a few weeks afterward sent the prisoner a short note. On August 26, he wrote a letter to me in return, in very neat longhand - which I only just received. I am reproducing most of that letter below.

Sept. 10, 2012

Dietrich Mullis and Mishko Novosel of Voice of Reason radio network join Carolyn Yeager for a spirited show that some may feel became pugnacious at times, but not really,  folks. It’s all in a friendly effort to get to the heart of things – Whites talking to Whites doesn’t get much better. Among many subjects discussed, some highlights:

Sept. 8, 2012

Are the stars crossed in perverse ways lately? Are unusual planetary formations involving Mercury (ruling communication) creating havoc here on earth amongst we poor mortals? Dietrich Mullis and Carolyn’s email messaging to each other got crossed just once and created confusion about  his appearing on this program. However, he eventually was able to call in during the 2nd hour with about 40 minutes left to go and the result was a helpful and informative chat. Thanks Dietrich!

In the first hour, Carolyn talked about the history of Voice of Reason Network (VOR), according to what she was able to find, with the idea of learning something from it. She spoke of several of the show hosts, especially Dietrich, Mishko and Peter Schaenk. The White Network’s new program host, August Hurst, came on in the last few minutes of the first hour and continued into the first quarter of the second hour, introducing his new weekly show “An Hour by the Window” to the listeners.  The program ended on a positive note.

Sept. 6, 2012

Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott read and comment on Chapter 9:  The Historic Basis of Jewish Imperialism

An important chapter that discusses the evidence of a Jewish World movement, the long-standing idea of a Chosen People, the Jewish Autocrat, the “exilarchs,” and the Sanhedrin.  From here we will move into nine chapters that examine the themes from the Protocols of Zion.

Image: “Synagogue” was part of a large mural painted by John Singer Sargent for the Boston Public Library. In 1919, because of protest from Jewry that this particular part was “antisemitic” in that it portrayed 'Synagogue' as an old hag while portraying “Church” as a lovely young girl, the mural project was suspended and the paintings were never shown. It first went up for public view in 2003.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Sept. 3, 2012

Carolyn Yeager‘s intended guest had to pull out suddenly, so the program changed to discussing Elie Wiesel in the first hour only, with Hadding Scott‘s new translation of Gottfried Feder’s “manifesto on breaking the shackles of interest” discussed in the second hour.  Topics include:

• The very real pressures from within families to be politically correct;
• Elie Wiesel as a publicity creation who has gotten rich working for the holocaust industry;
• Wiesel and rabbis protest Canada cutting refugee medical benefits;
• Hungarian nationalist government stands up to Holocaust Claims Conference amid cries of anti-semitism;
• Hadding Scott’s book due out at end of September;
• Mammonism; the problem of interest on debts; German revolution vs. global revolution;
• How much of Feder’s program did Hitler put into practice;
• And more.

Sept. 1, 2012